Skip to content

fix(checkpoint): degrade non-array history instead of crashing resume - #29195

Open
soroush5 wants to merge 2 commits into
google-gemini:mainfrom
soroush5:fix/checkpoint-shape-guard
Open

fix(checkpoint): degrade non-array history instead of crashing resume#29195
soroush5 wants to merge 2 commits into
google-gemini:mainfrom
soroush5:fix/checkpoint-shape-guard

Conversation

@soroush5

@soroush5 soroush5 commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

A checkpoint file with valid JSON but a non-array history crashed /resume resume with a raw TypeError. loadCheckpoint now verifies the shape and degrades to an empty checkpoint, like it already does for unparseable files.

Details

The object branch of loadCheckpoint only checked that the history key exists, then handed the raw value to resume — where null.length / number.slice threw. Corrupt shapes like these come from a crash mid-save, a full disk, or a hand edit. The fix checks Array.isArray before returning parsed content; anything else falls through to the existing corrupt-file warning + empty checkpoint. Valid checkpoints (including extra fields like authType) are untouched.

Related Issues

Fixes #29194

How to Validate

  1. npx vitest run src/core/logger.test.ts in packages/core — 41 passed, including 2 new wrong-shape regressions (null/number history).
  2. npm run preflight-relevant gates on touched files: ESLint zero warnings, Prettier clean.
  • Tests added, all passing
  • No breaking change (only corrupt files change behavior: clean miss instead of throw)
  • Validated on macOS; pure Node fs/path logic, platform-independent

@soroush5
soroush5 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2026 20:14
@google-cla

google-cla Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the size/s A small PR label Sep 3, 2026
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a stability issue where malformed checkpoint files containing non-array history data would cause the application to crash during the resume process. By validating the structure of the loaded checkpoint data, the system now gracefully degrades to an empty state when encountering corrupted files, ensuring consistent behavior across different failure scenarios.

Highlights

  • Robustness Improvement: Added a validation check in loadCheckpoint to ensure the history field is an array, preventing runtime crashes when encountering malformed checkpoint files.
  • Graceful Degradation: Implemented logic to treat checkpoints with non-array history as corrupt, causing them to fall back to an empty checkpoint state instead of throwing a TypeError.
  • Regression Testing: Added new test cases in logger.test.ts to verify that null or numeric history values are handled correctly without crashing.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📊 PR Size: size/S

  • Lines changed: 28
  • Additions: +26
  • Deletions: -2
  • Files changed: 2

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request ensures that the 'history' property of a loaded checkpoint is validated as an array before returning it. If the history is not an array (e.g., due to file corruption), it is handled gracefully as a corrupt file, returning an empty history. Unit tests have been added to verify this behavior. I have no further feedback to provide.

@gemini-cli gemini-cli Bot added priority/p2 Important but can be addressed in a future release. area/core Issues related to User Interface, OS Support, Core Functionality labels Sep 3, 2026
@soroush5

soroush5 commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/cla-check

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/core Issues related to User Interface, OS Support, Core Functionality priority/p2 Important but can be addressed in a future release. size/s A small PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Corrupt-shaped checkpoint crashes resume: non-array history passes through loadCheckpoint and throws TypeError

1 participant