Skip to content

Add a Pass Through command for use by intermediary nodes - #825

Open
shs96c wants to merge 1 commit into
w3c:masterfrom
shs96c:intermediary-pass-thru
Open

Add a Pass Through command for use by intermediary nodes#825
shs96c wants to merge 1 commit into
w3c:masterfrom
shs96c:intermediary-pass-thru

Conversation

@shs96c

@shs96c shs96c commented Mar 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is required to allow an intermediary node to send
commands upstream.


This change is Reviewable

@shs96c

shs96c commented Mar 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is a straw man that I intend to beat into shape using review comments. Be less than gentle.

@shs96c

shs96c commented Mar 1, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Depends on #824 in order to not introduce ReSpec errors.

This is required to allow an intermediary node to send
commands upstream.
@shs96c
shs96c force-pushed the intermediary-pass-thru branch from 7dc7aac to 480ef24 Compare March 1, 2017 15:59
Comment thread webdriver-spec.html
this command was called with. How this is done is outside the scope
of this specification.

<p class=issue>Set the headers of the HTTP request.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should just copy them from command to command here.

Comment thread webdriver-spec.html
<li><p>Let <var>data</var> be the result of <a data-lt="json
serialization">serializing as JSON</a> <var>parameters</var>.

<p class=note>This must create a JSON <a>Object</a> that is

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should just call <a>clone an object</a> here that will be passed through

@AutomatedTester

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shs96c wanna finish this off or close it?

@shs96c

shs96c commented Aug 11, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I do want to finish it.

@andreastt andreastt added this to the Level 2 milestone Aug 23, 2017
@jgraham

jgraham commented Nov 6, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Per the testing policy, this PR can't be accepted without a corresponding test in the web-platform-tests repository.

@andreastt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jgraham I’m not sure how easy it is to write tests for this in WPT. How do you envision writing intermediary tests to the current test setup?

I feel like this PR should be accepted in its current form if @shs96c wants to do the work on resolving the conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants