Skip to content

docs: clarify MLflow is required, not optional in RAG evaluation guide - #2447

Merged
anistark merged 1 commit into
vibrantlabsai:mainfrom
anistark:docs/improverag-example-fix
Nov 25, 2025
Merged

docs: clarify MLflow is required, not optional in RAG evaluation guide#2447
anistark merged 1 commit into
vibrantlabsai:mainfrom
anistark:docs/improverag-example-fix

Conversation

@anistark

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 24, 2025
@anistark
anistark merged commit ad892a6 into vibrantlabsai:main Nov 25, 2025
5 checks passed
@anistark
anistark deleted the docs/improverag-example-fix branch November 25, 2025 05:32
anistark added a commit to anistark/ragas that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
vibrantlabsai#2447)

## Issue Link / Problem Description
<!-- Link to related issue or describe the problem this PR solves -->
- Fixes vibrantlabsai#2442
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs: Evaluate and Improve a RAG App -- MLFlow not Optional

1 participant