Unified RowMapper infrastructure #2000
Conversation
93d0b53 to
a8044cb
Compare
schauder
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this looks mostly good to me.
I left some in line comments.
Plus the dependency test fails, so I guess some classes need to get shuffled around.
e87abbb to
1d65e9c
Compare
|
@schauder What |
1d65e9c to
0227022
Compare
4cb07a6 to
4bc2fd6
Compare
|
Could you please sign off on your commit for DCO. |
|
The PR is marked as draft. Is there anything you don't consider ready yet? |
|
@schauder The PR was inspired by the following issue in the YDB dialect on top of spring data jdbc. Most likely, we'll also need to allow for the extension of I'll convert it as ready very shortly, as soon as I'll understand that the dialect is capable to extend everything that it needs. Or, alternatively, we can merge this PR and other possible changes would happen in the upcoming PRs. What are your thoughts on this? |
|
Ok, I'll wait with further reviewing until we have something that is complete from your perspective. |
|
Hey @schauder! Thank you for the wait, we came up with the draft: I've pushed the remaining changes in the separate commit, because they do not directly related to unification of
|
e1477fd to
0cfc5d9
Compare
Signed-off-by: mipo256 <mikhailpolivakha@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: mipo256 <mikhailpolivakha@gmail.com>
0cfc5d9 to
3f56f75
Compare
3f56f75 to
8032c0f
Compare
571fd96 to
1f2e694
Compare
|
That is merged. Thanks. |
Fixes #1998