Propagator: Pump in more requests if we think current ones are quick - #4529
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
minor: this-> is unnecessary here and above
|
Looks good, only minor comments! |
4256f18 to
d78c367
Compare
Propagator: Pump in more requests if we think current ones are quick
|
@ckamm Thanks, merged with your recommended changes |
|
Yes, of course, it would speed up for small files, but there are still timeout problems when using parallelism with big files on slow connections, so it would be really nice, if you could let decide the user, how much parallelism he want's (dropdownbox?)! |
|
I think we need some specific QA for this, @guruz what do you think? Could you add some hints how to test and compare that to the state before to the test instructions in the wiki? |
|
hello team, where and how i and change parallelism or any manner to use all my bandwidth???? thank you |
|
@davidpablomitchell hi! it should already use all your bandwidth. Did you accidently activate the bandwidth limit in the settings? |
|
when i have lot of files i see the bandwidth is not all o have |
|
Hello sorry i download a bug file 1.5TB from server to client and my connection don't pass 30mb how can i use my line of 300mb with other type of software i can use 300mb downloading. |
5 participants
Helps with small file sync #331
When I benchmarked this, it went up to 6 parallelism and
was about 1/3 faster than the previous fixed 3 parallelism.
Doing more than 6 is dangerous because QNAM limits to 6 TCP
connections and also the server might become a bottleneck.
Should also help for #4081