Skip to content

feat: add jest-builders - #1068

Merged
markwhitfeld merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
feature/jest
May 20, 2019
Merged

feat: add jest-builders#1068
markwhitfeld merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
feature/jest

Conversation

@splincode

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

[ ] Bugfix
[x] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[ ] Build related changes
[ ] CI related changes
[ ] Documentation content changes
[ ] Other... Please describe:

What is the new behavior?

Use Jest instead Karma

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[x] No

@splincode
splincode requested review from arturovt and markwhitfeld and removed request for markwhitfeld May 18, 2019 17:08

@arturovt arturovt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Just add cacheDirectory as we discussed 馃帀

@splincode

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@arturovt done

@markwhitfeld markwhitfeld left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
Strange though that it thinks that you changed the whole .gitignore file.
PS. Can't wait to use this!!!

@markwhitfeld

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@splincode are there any docs updates needed?

@markwhitfeld
markwhitfeld merged commit 6241ebb into master May 20, 2019
@markwhitfeld
markwhitfeld deleted the feature/jest branch May 20, 2019 11:29
@splincode

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@markwhitfeld not need it

@markwhitfeld markwhitfeld mentioned this pull request May 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants