Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 53 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe action adds a ChangesPackaging option
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant ActionInput
participant run
participant StreamDeckCLI
ActionInput->>run: provide noFileList
run->>StreamDeckCLI: invoke packaging with --no-file-list when enabled
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@action.yml`:
- Around line 58-61: Set the GitHub Actions input definition for noFileList to a
documented falsy default, so omitted inputs provide a valid value to
core.getBooleanInput('noFileList') instead of an empty string.
In `@src/main.js`:
- Around line 20-23: Update the pinned `@elgato/cli` dependency and its lockfile
to a version that supports the --no-file-list option used in the argument
construction near the noFileList input handling. Verify the pack command
recognizes the flag and suppresses both the Plugin Contents log and
contents.files iteration, or replace it with a suppression option supported by
the pinned version.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: df64f965-4fc6-484b-9f9f-dd1854d0c0a1
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
dist/sourcemap-register.jsis excluded by!**/dist/**package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.devcontainer/devcontainer-lock.json.node-versionREADME.mdaction.ymlpackage.jsonsrc/main.js
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
noFileListoption to hide the list of packaged files after packing.Documentation
noFileListadvanced-use option and its default behavior.Chores