Skip to content

Users/hattorihenzo/support procedure call without curly braces - #3016

Open
Hattori Henzo (HattoriHenzo) wants to merge 3 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
HattoriHenzo:users/hattorihenzo/support-procedure-call-without-curly-braces
Open

Users/hattorihenzo/support procedure call without curly braces#3016
Hattori Henzo (HattoriHenzo) wants to merge 3 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
HattoriHenzo:users/hattorihenzo/support-procedure-call-without-curly-braces

Conversation

@HattoriHenzo

@HattoriHenzo Hattori Henzo (HattoriHenzo) commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

This pull request enhances the parsing and validation of SQL call syntax in the JDBC driver, ensuring correct handling of braces in stored procedure calls. It updates the regular expressions and logic to support both braced and unbraced syntax, adds validation for matching braces, and introduces comprehensive tests to verify correct and incorrect usage.

Allowed syntax: {call procedure(x,y)} or call procedure(x,y)

What's added

  • Updated the SQL_IDENTIFIER_PART regex in SQLServerStatement.java to more accurately match SQL identifiers, including those outside parentheses and braces.
  • Modified the JDBC_CALL_SYNTAX regex to support both optional opening and closing braces in procedure call syntax.
  • Added a check in the translate method to ensure SQL statements have matching braces before applying regex parsing, throwing a SQLServerException if mismatched.
  • Introduced the hasMatchingBraces helper method to encapsulate brace validation logic.

Testing

  • Added tests in CallableStatementTest.java to verify that procedure calls with and without braces work correctly, and that malformed calls with mismatched braces throw exceptions as expected.
  • Cleaned up test imports in CallableStatementTest.java for better readability.

@muskan124947

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hattori Henzo (@HattoriHenzo)

hasMatchingBraces breaks all JDBC escape syntax

translate() is called from SQLServerConnection.parseAndCacheSQL(), which runs for every Statement.execute() and every PreparedStatement (SQLServerStatement.java:1015-1017, SQLServerPreparedStatement.java:342-348) — not just callable statements. So this new guard gates all SQL:

Java

boolean hasOpenBrace  = trimmedSql.startsWith("{");
boolean hasCloseBrace = trimmedSql.endsWith("}");
return hasOpenBrace == hasCloseBrace;

Any statement that merely ends with } without starting with { now throws R_invalidSQL. That includes the driver's own escape sequences, handled ~20 lines below in the same method:

SQL

select * from t1 {limit 3543}                          -- LimitEscapeTest.java:318
select * from t1 {limit ( (  (2)))}                     -- LimitEscapeTest.java:291
SELECT * FROM t WHERE d < {ts '2024-01-01 00:00:00'}    -- ODBC/JDBC escape
SELECT {fn UCASE(name)}                                 -- ODBC scalar fn escape

LimitEscapeTest should fail outright with this change. Conversely {call p(?)} SELECT 1 (previously valid — note the trailing .*+ in the old regex) now throws.

The method also isn't brace matching at all — it compares the first and last characters. {call a(?)}{ passes; {call a(?)} inside a string literal isn't considered.

@machavan Mahendra Chavan (machavan) added this to the 13.7.0 milestone Aug 14, 2026
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hattori Henzo (@HattoriHenzo) please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]

Options:

  • (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
  • (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"
Contributor License Agreement

Contribution License Agreement

This Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
and conveys certain license rights to Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (“Microsoft”) for Your
contributions to Microsoft open source projects. This Agreement is effective as of the latest signature
date below.

  1. Definitions.
    “Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form,
    that is delivered by You to Microsoft under this Agreement.
    “Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by Microsoft and offered under a license
    approved by the Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org).
    “Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any
    Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control
    systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of
    discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or
    otherwise designated in writing by You as “Not a Submission.”
    “Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any
    associated comments and documentation.
  2. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any
    Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as
    described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.
  3. Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work.
    Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately
    to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You
    received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase “Submission
    containing materials of a third party:” followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other
    restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project’s written
    guidelines concerning Submissions.
  4. Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else
    for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your
    Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual
    property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your
    employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term “You” in this
    Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and
    desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement
    and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.
  5. Licenses.
  • Copyright License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the
    Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute
    the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third
    parties.
  • Patent License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under
    Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the
    Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and
    import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.
  • Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
    No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are
    granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.
  1. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above
    licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may
    have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to
    make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your
    employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable
    law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You
    have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement.
    You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS
    REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES
    EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
    PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF
    NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  2. Notice to Microsoft. You agree to notify Microsoft in writing of any facts or circumstances of which
    You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any
    respect.
  3. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about
    contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other
    information that You submit with Your Submission.
  4. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and
    the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County,
    Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to
    exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all
    defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.
  5. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and
    supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between
    the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Microsoft.

@HattoriHenzo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Muskan Gupta (@muskan124947) Thanks for your feedback, I will take a look on it.

@HattoriHenzo

Hattori Henzo (HattoriHenzo) commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Muskan Gupta (@muskan124947) I have to narrow the control of the SQL query syntax just only for CallableStatement? What do you think about implementing the control in this method SQLServerConnection#prepareCall, like at the line SQLServerConnection.java:5870 with the call of the method SQLServerConnection#checkClosed?

@muskan124947

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hattori Henzo (@HattoriHenzo)
Scoping this to the callable path is the right direction — it removes the {limit ...} / {ts ...} / {fn ...} regression, since translate() currently runs for every Statement and PreparedStatement via parseAndCacheSQL(), not just calls. Two notes on placement:

1. prepareCall(String, int, int) isn't the only entry point. There are two construction sites — SQLServerConnection.java:5872 and :8149 (the holdability overload). A check at line 5870 misses the second. The single choke point both funnel through is the SQLServerCallableStatement constructor (SQLServerCallableStatement.java:100); SQLServerConnection43 and SQLServerConnectionPoolProxy delegate down to these, so they're covered for free.

Keeping the check out of translate() also avoids a callable-only rule leaking into parsedSQLCache, which is keyed on SQL text and shared across all statement types.

2. The heuristic still has false positives, even scoped. startsWith("{") == endsWith("}") rejects valid callable SQL that works today:

Java

call p({ts '2024-01-01 00:00:00'})   // ends '}' → rejected (and it's the unbraced form you want!)
{call p(?)} -- trailing comment      // ends 't' → rejected
{call p(?)};                         // ends ';' → rejected

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: In progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants