Correct dataset name - #1
Open
acrmp wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Now that the swe_bench_verified_mini task exists it should not be necessary to modify swe_bench.py.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, thanks for creating this dataset!
This PR updates the README and
make_new_huggingface_dataset.pyto refer toswe-bench-verified-minirather thanswe-bench-verified-tiny.I've assumed that
swe-bench-verified-miniis the correct name andswe-bench-verified-tinyis an older discontinued name.After this PR there will still be a reference to
swe-bench-verified-tinyin the generateddataset_info.json, I didn't think it was appropriate to modify the generated file in this PR.I've also updated the README to suggest the use of the
swe_bench_verified_minitask in inspect evals rather than modifyingswe_bench.py.