PyPI: populate RichResult timestamp metadata - #344
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Populate
RichResult.creation_timefor PyPI releases using metadata already available in the existing PyPI JSON response.A PyPI version may contain multiple distribution files, each with its own
upload_time_iso_8601. This change uses the earliest available file upload timestamp as the release creation time.No additional HTTP requests are introduced.
creation_timerevision_creation_timeupload_time_iso_8601among its distribution filesNoneThe implementation preserves the current behavior for:
If a release has no files, or none of its files provides
upload_time_iso_8601,creation_timeremainsNone.Tests cover:
The PyPI documentation now includes the corresponding
RichResultmetadata table.