Fix bug where lock is acquired on wrong database table - #4863
Closed
arnaudsjs wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
sanderr
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2022
wouterdb
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2022
Contributor
|
Processing this pull request |
inmantaci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2022
…because it acquires a table-level lock on an incorrect database table. (Issue #4834, PR #4863) # Description Fix bug where lock is acquired on the ConfigurationModel table instead of the ResourceAction table. This bug causes deadlocks. closes #4834 # Self Check: - [x] Attached issue to pull request - [x] Changelog entry - [x] Type annotations are present - [x] Code is clear and sufficiently documented - [x] No (preventable) type errors (check using make mypy or make mypy-diff) - [x] Sufficient test cases (reproduces the bug/tests the requested feature) - [x] Correct, in line with design - [ ] ~~End user documentation is included or an issue is created for end-user documentation~~ # Reviewer Checklist: - [ ] Sufficient test cases (reproduces the bug/tests the requested feature) - [ ] Code is clear and sufficiently documented - [ ] Correct, in line with design
Contributor
|
Merged into branches master in ddada43 |
inmantaci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2022
…because it acquires a table-level lock on an incorrect database table. (Issue #4834, PR #4863) # Description Fix bug where lock is acquired on the ConfigurationModel table instead of the ResourceAction table. This bug causes deadlocks. closes #4834 # Self Check: - [x] Attached issue to pull request - [x] Changelog entry - [x] Type annotations are present - [x] Code is clear and sufficiently documented - [x] No (preventable) type errors (check using make mypy or make mypy-diff) - [x] Sufficient test cases (reproduces the bug/tests the requested feature) - [x] Correct, in line with design - [ ] ~~End user documentation is included or an issue is created for end-user documentation~~ # Reviewer Checklist: - [ ] Sufficient test cases (reproduces the bug/tests the requested feature) - [ ] Code is clear and sufficiently documented - [ ] Correct, in line with design
Contributor
|
Processing #4866. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fix bug where lock is acquired on the ConfigurationModel table instead of the ResourceAction table. This bug causes deadlocks.
closes #4834
Self Check:
End user documentation is included or an issue is created for end-user documentationReviewer Checklist: