Clarify handling of null handling within lists#317
Conversation
As it stands, the spec is unclear on what to do when an Non-Null element of a list resolves to null. These changes clarify that the entire list should resolve to null, and to propagate the error upwards
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla - and if you have received this in error or have any questions, please drop us a line at cla@fb.com. Thanks! If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer): the individual CLA is not sufficient - use https://developers.facebook.com/opensource/cla?type=company instead. Contact cla@fb.com if you have any questions. |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for this clarification. I agree this is a helpful addition! |
3 participants
As it stands, the spec is unclear on what to do when an Non-Null element of a list resolves to null. These changes clarify that the entire list should resolve to null, and to propagate the error upwards