Documentation for explicitly mentioning ObjectTypes - #1679
Conversation
Based on the discussion at graphql#1413
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need the corporate CLA signed. If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
- provide more clear example /w interfaces & types - rewrite to note with more clarity - move the note above the note on directives
|
@buoyantair Merged 🎉 Thanks for PR 👍 |
|
Unfortunately this change didn't arrive in the documentation at https://graphql.org/graphql-js/type/#graphqlschema. Is there something else that needs to be done for that? |
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
would address graphql#1679 I think a simpler version than graphql#1683
Based on the discussion at #1413