-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
Add support for 'canceling' status for variant analysis #3405
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
681c761
Add support for 'canceling' status for variant analysis
charisk 35ae44f
Add storybook story for canceling state
charisk 907febe
Update CHANGELOG
charisk 9e1f44b
Move logic to mapUpdatedVariantAnalysis
charisk f0ea640
Update variant analysis stats area when canceling
charisk 6606764
Add some more tests
charisk e2d6e6a
Add comment to explain why we get the status
charisk c32040f
Update extensions/ql-vscode/src/variant-analysis/variant-analysis-mon…
charisk 07edfdf
Merge branch 'main' into charisk/variant-analysis-canceling-status
charisk 9dbea25
Fix build after merging main
charisk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure adding this code to
onVariantAnalysisUpdatedis going to do what we want.As far as I can tell this method is only called from within
cancelVariantAnalysis. Once when we set the status toCancelingand once more if we want to set it back toInProgress.So it won't help when we get updates from the monitoring job which will try to set the status to
InProgress. It will also hinder us because it'll undo the change we're trying to make in thecatchblock ofcancelVariantAnalysis.I think instead we might want to add this logic to
mapUpdatedVariantAnalysis?What do you think? Have I understood things correctly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you're right. I did a last minute refactor here and didn't think through all the cases I had in mind on Friday.
I'm also having some trouble with testing manually atm - I seem to be testing against older versions of the code somehow. I'm either being forgetful with builds or the watcher/build is a bit off.
I'll move some logic to
mapUpdatedVariantAnalysis.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, I missed originally that we pass
onVariantAnalysisUpdatedintovariantAnalysisMonitor.onVariantAnalysisChange, so it was called in other places. But the point still stands about when we want to set that status back when cancelation fails, so the other changes you made are still the right thing.