PRs in need of review

[seanmil]

After concerns from a long stretch of little/no activity and then some PR review and a release prompted by a conversation in #213 and a commitment to do better at maintaining octocatalog-diff, this project is starting to feel a bit abandoned again.

Case in point, PR #226 for the addition of Puppet 6 support will be at three months of no review or feedback from the project maintainers tomorrow. I have posted three additional PRs that perhaps no one other than myself would care about, but there was definitely some active community interest in #226 and it sounds like a number of people may be running internal forks with that code (as we now are).

Any chance we could get some maintainer review soon? Thanks!

[seanmil]

@ahayworth Andrew, I am tagging you because you were the one who stepped up and did the reviews/merges/release in October of 2019. If you could offer some assistance here I think the Octocatalog-Diff using community would appreciate it. Thanks!

[ahayworth]

@seanmil Thank you so much for pinging me directly. Turns out that I had only watched Participating and @-mentions on this repo, and that's definitely not enough! I'll take a look at these ASAP - and I've fixed my notifications 🤦 🤦 🤦 🤦

[seanmil]

@seanmil Thank you so much for pinging me directly. Turns out that I had only watched Participating and @-mentions on this repo, and that's definitely not enough! I'll take a look at these ASAP - and I've fixed my notifications 🤦 🤦 🤦 🤦

I'm glad I did! Thanks for responding so quickly and providing such great feedback.

Octocatalog-Diff is a great tool and a crucial and invaluable part of our testing process.

[ahayworth]

I'm going to go ahead and cut a 2.0 release with the PRs that we merged in before Christmas (I was planning on doing a Christmas-ish release, but life got in the way 🤣 ). I'm going to go ahead and close this particular issue out since I've fixed my notifications. 😄