Skip to content

Ignore archived metadata - #14761

Draft
Caleb-T-Owens wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
caleb/ignore-archived-branches
Draft

Ignore archived metadata#14761
Caleb-T-Owens wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
caleb/ignore-archived-branches

Conversation

@Caleb-T-Owens

@Caleb-T-Owens Caleb-T-Owens commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The archived metadata flag was primarily intended so we could keep metadata for PRs that got integrated up stream.

At one point in time when we infered workspace state from the vb.toml, if this flag wasn’t set, we could accidentally include extra commits.

These days however, we should only use the target_commit_id to determine what is or isn’t shown. The archived flag shouldn’t hide commits that should be shown due to their topology


This is part 2 of 2 in a stack made with GitButler:

The archived metadata flag was primarily intended so we could keep metadata for PRs that got integrated up stream.

At one point in time when we infered workspace state from the vb.toml, if this flag wasn’t set, we could accidentally include extra commits.

These days however, we should only use the target_commit_id to determine what is or isn’t shown. The archived flag shouldn’t hide commits that should be shown due to their topology
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the rust Pull requests that update Rust code label Jul 14, 2026
@Caleb-T-Owens
Caleb-T-Owens force-pushed the caleb/next-project-meta-migration-step branch 3 times, most recently from 9dc74a5 to d9a5569 Compare July 23, 2026 10:17
Base automatically changed from caleb/next-project-meta-migration-step to master July 23, 2026 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rust Pull requests that update Rust code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant