feat(music): add additional genres#2621
Conversation
|
In addition to the call outs about |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #2621 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 99.93% 99.94%
========================================
Files 2960 2960
Lines 211366 211617 +251
Branches 604 953 +349
========================================
+ Hits 211231 211499 +268
+ Misses 135 114 -21
- Partials 0 4 +4
|
ST-DDT
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure whether we should include genres like <any country> X.
What do the others think?
|
@ST-DDT I had similar thoughts on the country names. There were some examples where e.g. |
|
I tend to agree that France or French is not really a genre. If a French is performing rock, it's Rock. If it's a classical piece, it's Classical, rather than just lumping it under French. So maybe let's remove all country/language genres. |
|
Sorry for my late feedback. The list you provided is very comprehensive. Would it be better to organize the genres into "main" and "sub" categories? I can see people requesting the possibility of only getting "common" genres. For features like this we would need to introduce a breaking change. Is that something we should consider? |
i'd say we dont really do that anywhere else. You can't request "common" first names or "common" dog breeds or "common" countries. There's no standard list of what a musical genre is. |
We have: I see more reason to differenciate betrween common and sub music genres as some genres are literally described as "x is a subgenre of y". For example:
I'm just trying to think ahead to avoid potential breaking chages. If all of you think this is unnecessary I'm fine with that as well. |
|
Team Decision
|
✅ Deploy Preview for fakerjs canceled.
|
This PR is split off from #2620 where I originally added additional genres along with new
albumandartistNamemethods.Genres were compiled primarily from these resources:
Based on feedback in #2620 from the original set I added I tried to clean up some of the odd/awkward genres adopted from the sources, e.g. just specifying "Holiday" or "Classical" instead of listing some of the sub-types from the resources. Happy to clean up the list further if desired!