Skip to content

esm with tsup demonstration#2401

Merged
Shinigami92 merged 1 commit intoconvert-to-esmfrom
esm-with-tsup-that-supports-cjs
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

esm with tsup demonstration#2401
Shinigami92 merged 1 commit intoconvert-to-esmfrom
esm-with-tsup-that-supports-cjs

Conversation

@Shinigami92
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 commented Sep 17, 2023

This PR shows that with tsup + the esm migration all tests are passing

So this is the combination of

together with outputting .cjs files instead of .esm


I also tested with the playground and everything works fine 🎉

@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 self-assigned this Sep 17, 2023
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 changed the title chore: convert to esm esm with tsup demonstration Sep 17, 2023
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Sep 17, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (convert-to-esm@ed51481). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             convert-to-esm    #2401   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   99.55%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?     2817           
  Lines                     ?   251199           
  Branches                  ?     1124           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?   250088           
  Misses                    ?     1082           
  Partials                  ?       29           

@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 added the do NOT merge yet Do not merge this PR into the target branch yet label Sep 20, 2023
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 force-pushed the esm-with-tsup-that-supports-cjs branch from a021a8f to fbefff7 Compare September 20, 2023 15:15
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 force-pushed the esm-with-tsup-that-supports-cjs branch from fbefff7 to 3a00c1f Compare January 19, 2024 10:15
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 force-pushed the esm-with-tsup-that-supports-cjs branch from 3a00c1f to 1f151da Compare February 16, 2024 16:35
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 16:38
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 16, 2024 16:38
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 merged commit 0a680b0 into convert-to-esm Feb 16, 2024
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 deleted the esm-with-tsup-that-supports-cjs branch February 16, 2024 16:38
@ST-DDT ST-DDT removed the do NOT merge yet Do not merge this PR into the target branch yet label Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants