fix(ci): sync pnpm-lock.yaml with package.json (unblock release)

[JohnMcLear]

The release / publish-npm job on main is failing at pnpm i --frozen-lockfile with ERR_PNPM_OUTDATED_LOCKFILE: #263 (#428) removed the underscore dependency from package.json but the lockfile still listed it, so every push to main fails to publish.

Regenerated pnpm-lock.yaml to match package.json (drops underscore). Verified pnpm i --frozen-lockfile now exits 0. Tests are unaffected (this only touches the lockfile).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[qodo-code-review]

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

Review Summary by Qodo

Sync pnpm-lock.yaml with package.json and fix CI publish

🐞 Bug fix

Walkthroughs

Description

• Remove outdated underscore dependency from lockfile
• Sync pnpm-lock.yaml with package.json changes
• Add missing libc platform specifiers for Linux binaries
• Unblock npm publish CI job on main branch

Diagram

flowchart LR
  A["package.json<br/>removed underscore"] -->|"sync"| B["pnpm-lock.yaml<br/>regenerated"]
  B -->|"fixes"| C["CI release job<br/>pnpm i --frozen-lockfile"]
  C -->|"enables"| D["npm publish<br/>unblocked"]

Loading

File Changes

1. pnpm-lock.yaml 🐞 Bug fix +6/-8

Remove underscore and sync lockfile

• Removed underscore@1.13.8 dependency entry and its snapshot
• Added missing libc platform specifiers for Linux-based rspack resolver bindings
• Regenerated lockfile to match current package.json state
• Resolves ERR_PNPM_OUTDATED_LOCKFILE error in CI pipeline

pnpm-lock.yaml

---

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review