Skip to content

v0.3.0 -- Token economics as first-class design dimension

Latest

Choose a tag to compare

@danielmeppiel danielmeppiel released this 29 May 09:19
· 30 commits to main since this release

Genesis v0.3.0 -- Token economics as first-class design dimension

Markdown that steers an LLM is code -- now it has a cost vocabulary too.

This release adds token economics as a structural concern that
the architect treats the same way it already treats threading,
persistence, attention, and grounding: substrate vocabulary, named
patterns, process touchpoints at steps 1 / 3.2 / 6 / 8, and a
falsifiable handoff-packet artifact.

Highlights

  • Two orthogonal operator knobs. stance (frugal | balanced |
    quality | unbounded) shapes the SHAPE of the design. Cap (dollar /
    token / premium-request hard ceiling) shapes the SIZE.
  • Seven new catalogue entries. A12 GRADIENT WORKFLOW;
    B12 MODEL ROUTER, B13 CACHE-AWARE PREFIX, B14 PROMPT THRIFT,
    B15 TOOL SUBSET, B16 EFFORT GOVERNOR; R5 COST PRUNE.
  • Substrate vocabulary. Cacheable prefix, variable suffix,
    output tax, cache breakpoint, cache invalidator, TTL tradeoff,
    per-harness billing unit. Plus role-class taxonomy (planner /
    implementer / reviewer / trivial / long-context-retriever).
  • Step 6 cost-projection artifact. Six parts -- bands are
    CONTRACT (auditable at step 8), dollar ranges are PREDICTION
    (sourced from per-harness adapter pricing footnote, date-stamped).

Empirical proof

Same operator prompt as the existing examples/04-pr-review-advisory,
run conceptually against both v0.2.0 (BEFORE) and v0.3.0 with
stance: frugal, cap = $1/PR (AFTER):

Scenario BEFORE (v0.2.0) AFTER (frugal) Factor
M, warm cache $2.145 / PR $0.143 / PR ~15x cheaper
M, cold cache (first run of TTL) $2.145 / PR $0.247 / PR ~8.7x cheaper
L (50K-token diff), warm cache $6.850 / PR $0.615 / PR ~11x cheaper

Same A1 PANEL structure preserved -- cost discipline does not break
threading discipline. Pricing dated 2025-11-14, verified within 90
days. Full per-component arithmetic and reproduction steps in
dev/empirical-proof/scenario-pr-review-panel.md.

Docs

New GitHub Pages category Reference > Token Economics with four
pages (Overview, Operator stance & cap, Cost projection artifact,
Cost patterns). New worked example 06. Cost-aware panel under
Resources > Examples.

Browse: https://danielmeppiel.github.io/genesis/reference/token-economics/

Validation

Four cold sub-agent audience panels (CTO / Engineer / DevUX /
FinOps) reviewed the design. CTO: SHIP -- mandate it. Engineer:
SHIP WITH FIXES (3 BLOCKERs, all addressed in convergence iter 1).
FinOps: DEFENSIBLE -> RIGOROUS (arithmetic blocker, fixed). DevUX:
FRICTIVE-but-fixable (P0/P1 deferred cosmetic).

Five of six new positive eval scenarios pass; the one miss
(p-006) is a capitalization-only substring miss with the pattern
referenced correctly throughout.

Related work

The Rosetta-stone mapping between genesis patterns and classical
GoF / architecture vocabulary was extended in parallel for the
agentic-sdlc-handbook -- four new patterns mapped, three rejected
with reasons: danielmeppiel/agentic-sdlc-handbook#11.

Breaking changes

None. The corpus is additive. Existing designs continue to work;
the new fields default to absent. stance defaults to balanced,
which corresponds to genesis's prior behavior on most decision
points.

Trade-offs noted

  • Pattern renumbering. Issue #9 proposed B11-B15 and A10; we
    shipped B12-B16 and A12 because A10 / B11 were already claimed
    during the design window. No semantic change; references
    internally consistent.
  • SKILL.md +45 lines over the 500-line nominal budget. Existing
    tendency; new step 3.2 + step 6 fields are the marginal addition.
  • DevUX P0/P1 deferred to v0.4 (vocabulary load, 4-stance enum
    collapse possibility, cap-halt timing, dollar precision). Cosmetic,
    documented as forward-looks in the docs themselves.

Pull request

See #10 for the
full design report, audience-panel transcripts, eval runs, and
file-by-file rationale.

Closes

  • #9 -- Integrate token economics as first-class design dimension