Skip to content

test: exercise security reviewer workflow [DO NOT MERGE] - #3300

Draft
WesleyRosenblum wants to merge 4 commits into
aws:mainfrom
WesleyRosenblum:test/security-reviewer-regressions
Draft

test: exercise security reviewer workflow [DO NOT MERGE]#3300
WesleyRosenblum wants to merge 4 commits into
aws:mainfrom
WesleyRosenblum:test/security-reviewer-regressions

Conversation

@WesleyRosenblum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Release Summary:

Resolved issues:

None.

Description of changes:

DO NOT MERGE. SECURITY REVIEWER WORKFLOW TEST.

This draft intentionally weakens multiple security and protocol-safety checks in production code to exercise an automated security reviewer workflow. These changes are not intended for release or deployment.

Call-outs:

The planted findings are intentionally not enumerated here so the reviewer can be evaluated independently. Close this draft without merging after the workflow test is complete.

Testing:

  • cargo fmt --all -- --check
  • cargo build -p s2n-codec@0.88.0 -p s2n-quic-transport@0.88.0 -p s2n-quic-dc@0.88.0

Both commands completed successfully.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Intentionally weaken several independent validation and protocol safety checks to exercise the security reviewer workflow. This commit is test-only and must not be merged.
Add more intentionally unsafe validation and protocol changes to exercise the newly enabled security review workflow. This commit is test-only and must not be merged.
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Security review

Commit Result Report
5d8c5c1f5aad ❌ Blocking View report
430384ea59db ✅ Passed View report

Report access is restricted to maintainers.

Restore every validation and protocol-safety check deliberately weakened for the security reviewer workflow test. The affected source files now match main exactly.
Document why decoder bounds checks and authenticated-decryption error propagation must remain in place.

@boquan-fang boquan-fang left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The behavior of the next couple runs of tests are updating the existing comment instead of submitting another comment. Personally, I find submitting another comment might be more useful, since it tracks the flow of commits.
#3300 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants