docs(ec2): clarify RouterType.GATEWAY supports Virtual Private Gateway - #38358
Closed
wasim-builds wants to merge 0 commit into
Closed
docs(ec2): clarify RouterType.GATEWAY supports Virtual Private Gateway#38358wasim-builds wants to merge 0 commit into
wasim-builds wants to merge 0 commit into
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
effort/small
wasim-builds
force-pushed
the
fix/ec2-routertype-gateway-doc
branch
from
July 21, 2026 16:19
88c20a3 to
1272cc3
Compare
wasim-builds
force-pushed
the
fix/ec2-routertype-gateway-doc
branch
from
July 23, 2026 15:03
1272cc3 to
3e4c5cd
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Rebased onto latest |
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 23, 2026 15:27 — with 
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 23, 2026 15:27 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
aws-cdk-automation
added
the
pr/needs-further-review
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 23, 2026 15:36 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 23, 2026 15:36 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 23, 2026 15:37 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 23, 2026 15:37 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
aws-cdk-automation
added
the
pr/needs-community-review
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 28, 2026 15:42 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
aws-cdk-automation
temporarily deployed
to
automation
July 28, 2026 15:42 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Contributor
Please make sure your PR references an existing issue using the format |
wasim-builds
force-pushed
the
fix/ec2-routertype-gateway-doc
branch
from
August 19, 2026 11:06
7b3e709 to
74d922c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Contributor
|
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #38358
Summary
Clarify that
RouterType.GATEWAYsupports Virtual Private Gateway (VGW) attachments in the EC2 VPN module.Problem
The documentation for
RouterType.GATEWAYdid not explicitly mention VGW support, leading to confusion about whether classic VPN gateways could be used with this router type.Fix
Updated the doc comment to explicitly state VGW compatibility.
Scope
Documentation-only change in EC2 VPN module. No runtime behavior changes.