Register read_only_base shortname in managed_role_templates

[cshiels-ie]

ManagedReadOnlyBase existed as a class but was not accessible via the ANSIBLE_BASE_MANAGED_ROLE_REGISTRY shortname system, forcing consuming apps to instantiate and register it manually in their AppConfig.ready().

Adding 'read_only_base' to managed_role_templates lets apps declare read-only managed roles through settings alone, consistent with how admin_base and action_base are already exposed.

Assisted-by: Claude Code (claude-sonnet-4-6)

Description

• What is being changed?
• Why is this change needed?
• How does this change address the issue?

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Test update
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• Development environment change
• Configuration change

Self-Review Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have added relevant comments to complex code sections
• I have updated documentation where needed
• I have considered the security impact of these changes
• I have considered performance implications
• I have thought about error handling and edge cases
• I have tested the changes in my local environment

Testing Instructions

Prerequisites

Steps to Test

Expected Results

Additional Context

Required Actions

• Requires documentation updates
• Requires downstream repository changes
• Requires infrastructure/deployment changes
• Requires coordination with other teams
• Blocked by PR/MR: #XXX

Screenshots/Logs

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: ec14654e-ac46-45c7-ad9d-719fbe58d7ef

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

DVCS PR Check Results:

Could not find JIRA key(s) in PR title, branch name, or commit messages

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.70%. Comparing base (6752630) to head (f6c6d03).

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #1023   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.70%   94.70%           
=======================================
  Files         253      253           
  Lines       13495    13495           
  Branches     2043     2043           
=======================================
  Hits        12781    12781           
  Misses        714      714           

Flag	Coverage Δ
py311	94.64% <ø> (ø)
py311-django4	94.68% <ø> (ø)
py311-in-files	94.67% <ø> (ø)
py311-sqlite	93.98% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
py312	94.64% <ø> (ø)
py312-django4	94.68% <ø> (ø)
py312-in-files	94.64% <ø> (ø)
py312-sqlite	93.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
ansible_base/rbac/managed.py	92.68% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6752630...f6c6d03. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud