Could not find GraalVM for SemVer 17

[violetagg]

Description:
The issue below started to appear on 16.10.2024 without any changes in the project

Trying to resolve the latest version from remote
  Error: Could not find GraalVM for SemVer 17

Task version:
v4

Platform:

• Ubuntu
• macOS
• Windows

Runner type:

• Hosted
• Self-hosted

Repro steps:
https://github.com/reactor/reactor-netty/actions/runs/11357786129

      - name: Set up GraalVM 17
        uses: actions/setup-java@b36c23c0d998641eff861008f374ee103c25ac73
        with:
            distribution: 'graalvm'
            java-version: '17'

Expected behavior:
GraalVM to be installed

Actual behavior:
GraalVM is not installed

[v-priyagupta108]

Hi @violetagg 👋,
Thank you for your report. We'll investigate the issue and get back to you with the details!

[rubarcelk]

Hey, any updates about this issue?

[v-priyagupta108]

Hello @violetagg,
The action uses the latest URLs to resolve java-version: '17' for Oracle GraalVM. Unfortunately, these URLs are no longer available. As a result, specifying java-version: '17' no longer works. However, you can specify java-version: '17.0.12', which will pull from the archive and function correctly.

Please feel free to reach out to us in case of any concerns.

[violetagg]

@priyagupta108 Thanks for the suggestion. It is working now https://github.com/reactor/reactor-netty/actions/runs/11493523710
We can close this.

[Marcono1234]

The underlying issue seems to be that licensing for GraalVM for JDK 17 changed in September 2024, and newer JDK 17 versions are not available anymore under the "GraalVM Free Terms and Conditions (GFTC)". See #501 (comment) and related discussion in graalvm/setup-graalvm#107 ¹.

However, @fniephaus (or maintainers of actions/setup-java), would it make sense to add detection of 17 as value and in that case automatically replace it with 17.0.12 and emit a warning, similar to how it is done in graalvm/setup-graalvm?

Or was this only done in graalvm/setup-graalvm due to the larger number of existing GraalVM for JDK 17 users, whereas here the number of users is not that large yet, and they should rather use GraalVM for JDK 21 instead of an outdated GraalVM for JDK 17 version?

Footnotes

1. To summarize these discussions: It seems you won't accidentally use GraalVM versions under a different (more restrictive) license, but instead are stuck on the latest GraalVM version under the old permissive license (here version 17.0.12). Or you have to update to a newer version, e.g. GraalVM for JDK 21, which will also be under the permissive license for a few years, see https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase/jdk-faqs.html#GraalVM-licensing (for GraalVM for JDK 21 that is September 2026). ↩