Fix pluralization in the easiest way (for now) - #101
Merged
Conversation
pascalduez
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2018
pascalduez
left a comment
pascalduez
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking really good, thanks!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the future, we could use a pluralization library, but for now, we're just checking if the word we want to pluralize ends on a 's'. Everything else might be overkill too, since we have a non-arbitrary amount of phrases we use for headlines/pluralisation.