Skip to content

fix: disable address normalization when checking blocked MMS senders - #644

Merged
naveensingh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
naveensingh/correct-mms-blocking
Dec 21, 2025
Merged

fix: disable address normalization when checking blocked MMS senders#644
naveensingh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
naveensingh/correct-mms-blocking

Conversation

@naveensingh

@naveensingh naveensingh commented Dec 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Type of change(s)

  • Bug fix
  • Feature / enhancement
  • Infrastructure / tooling (CI, build, deps, tests)
  • Documentation

What changed and why

Removed MMS sender address normalization when checking against blocked numbers. Previously, blocking an alphanumeric address such as VE-ViCARE would block MMS messages from VE-ViCARE and the normalized number 83842273. Even if that collision never occurs in the real world, removing normalization is the correct move and is consistent with how SMS blocking works.

Closes the following issue(s)

  • Not tracked.

Checklist

  • I read the contribution guidelines.
  • I manually tested my changes on device/emulator (if applicable).
  • I updated the "Unreleased" section in CHANGELOG.md (if applicable).
  • I have self-reviewed my pull request (no typos, formatting errors, etc.).
  • All checks are passing.

@naveensingh naveensingh changed the title fix: disable address normalization when checking blocked MMS senders fix: disable address normalization for MMS senders Dec 21, 2025
@naveensingh naveensingh changed the title fix: disable address normalization for MMS senders fix: disable address normalization when checking blocked MMS senders Dec 21, 2025
This is more accurate, but it shouldn't alter the blocking behavior, as the system handles that.
@naveensingh
naveensingh merged commit 14dc9ce into main Dec 21, 2025
9 checks passed
@naveensingh
naveensingh deleted the naveensingh/correct-mms-blocking branch December 21, 2025 10:31
@fossifybot fossifybot Bot mentioned this pull request Dec 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant