Skip to content

JPEG2000 (OpenJPH) signed integer overflow in buffer allocation

High
lgritz published GHSA-pj45-cf3g-28gq May 3, 2026

Package

OpenImageIO

Affected versions

<= 3.1.12

Patched versions

>= 3.0.18.0, >= 3.1.13.0, >= 3.2.0.2

Description

Summary

jpeg2000input.cpp:395 computes buffer size as const int bufsize = w * h * ch * buffer_bpp using signed 32-bit arithmetic. When the product exceeds INT_MAX, the result wraps to 0 or a small value. m_buf.resize() allocates an undersized buffer, and subsequent pixel write loops cause heap overflow. Conditional on USE_OPENJPH build flag.

Details

Line 395:

const int bufsize = w * h * ch * buffer_bpp;  // all int, signed overflow
m_buf.resize(bufsize);  // undersized or empty buffer

Lines 419-447 then write pixels based on actual w*h*ch dimensions into the undersized buffer.

For w=32768, h=32768, ch=4, buffer_bpp=2:

  • True size: 8,589,934,592 bytes (8.0 GB)
  • As signed int32: 0 (wraps)
  • m_buf.resize(0) → empty buffer
  • Pixel writes → massive heap overflow

Additionally, the JPEG2000 reader never calls check_open(), bypassing the global limit_imagesize_MB protection that guards other format readers.

This is the same pattern fixed in CVE-2023-42295 (BMP signed integer overflow).

PoC

Arithmetic proof:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <limits.h>

int main(void) {
    int w = 32768, h = 32768, ch = 4, bpp = 2;
    int bufsize = w * h * ch * bpp;
    long long real_size = (long long)w * h * ch * bpp;
    printf("int result:  %d\n", bufsize);    // 0
    printf("real result: %lld\n", real_size); // 8589934592
    printf("Overflow:    YES\n");
    return 0;
}

Output:

int result:  0
real result: 8589934592
Overflow:    YES

A valid HTJ2K codestream with large dimensions would trigger the heap overflow at runtime. Generating one requires an HTJ2K encoder.

Suggested fix

size_t bufsize = size_t(w) * size_t(h) * size_t(ch) * size_t(buffer_bpp);
if (bufsize > size_t(std::numeric_limits<int>::max())) {
    errorfmt("Image too large for buffer allocation");
    return false;
}
m_buf.resize(bufsize);

Also add check_open() call to enforce dimension limits consistently with other readers.

Impact

Heap buffer overflow when opening a crafted JPEG2000 file with large dimensions. Only affects builds compiled with USE_OPENJPH. Same vulnerability class as CVE-2023-42295 (BMP integer overflow, fixed in 2.5.3.0).

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Local
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements Present
Privileges Required None
User interaction Active
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-43905

Weaknesses

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits