Skip to content

The lts_builder add_transition should not be called from different threads, even with a mutex #1945

Description

@mlaveaux

Describe the bug
Calling add_transition from a different thread can result in multi_action terms being moved from a thread that does not own this term.

Solution
I think the solution is that utilities::unordered_map_large<lps::multi_action, std::size_t> m_actions; should be an atermpp::unordered_map_large.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions