Skip to content

Lung health check first post#135

Merged
ralph-hawkins merged 6 commits intomainfrom
lung-health-check-first-post
Jun 26, 2025
Merged

Lung health check first post#135
ralph-hawkins merged 6 commits intomainfrom
lung-health-check-first-post

Conversation

@ralph-hawkins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of the service’s discovery — which is the health assessment discovery, that has now led to the lung health check service.

@frankieroberto frankieroberto temporarily deployed to screening-de-lung-healt-fesvvh June 9, 2025 12:22 Inactive
- adds PDFs to post
- updates post text
- adds PDF folder
- updates eleventy.config.js to pass through PDFs
@frankieroberto frankieroberto temporarily deployed to screening-de-lung-healt-fesvvh June 13, 2025 15:04 Inactive
@frankieroberto frankieroberto temporarily deployed to screening-de-lung-healt-fesvvh June 13, 2025 15:07 Inactive

### Stage 1: Matrix analysis

We developed a Matrix to measure and better understand the details of assessments in relation to ten key categories. This process established whether the assessment in question is something we could take forward for further consideration. The evaluation criteria are consistent for each category and an overall conclusion is drawn for each as high, medium, low or positive and negative.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the list could do with an Oxford comma:

high, medium, low, or positive and negative.


Evidence strongly confirms that offering health checks to patients contributes to reducing health risks.

However, we don't sufficiently understand what types of checks would provide the most benefit to patients if offered as a digital self‑assessment. It is also unclear if providing healthcare professionals (HCPs) with a choice between digital and in‑person assessments would add value.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

However, we do not


### Spoke to experts

Regular consultations with internal technical and clinical subject matter experts (SMEs), explored clinical feasibility, safety, and what is likely to resonate with healthcare professionals, as well as considering technical possibilities and constraints. We also gathered insights from providers of health assessments, digital tools, and biometric tests.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sentence starting 'Regular consultations' is quite long. Would suggest:

Regular consultations with internal technical and clinical subject matter experts (SMEs). Explored clinical feasibility, safety, and what is likely to resonate with healthcare professionals. As well as considering technical possibilities and constraints. We also gathered insights from providers of health assessments, digital tools, and biometric tests.


### Desk research

Reviewing the NHS Health Check Online discovery and alpha reports, analysed NICE guidelines, NHS and DHSC policy documents (for example, Core20Plus5, NHS Long Term Plan, Digital Prevention Strategy), and studied public health literature, independent pilot studies, and past user research.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could this be a bulleted list instead?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@ralph-hawkins ralph-hawkins Jun 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something like this?

Reviewing the NHS Health Check Online discovery and alpha reports, analysed NICE guidelines, NHS and DHSC policy documents, for example:
- Core20Plus5
- NHS Long Term Plan
- Digital Prevention Strategy

We also studied:
- public health literature
- independent pilot studies
- past user research

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think 'reviewing', 'analysing' and 'studying' are pretty synonymous. I'd suggest:

We reviewed:

  • NHS health check online discovery and alpha reports
  • NICE guidelines
  • NHS and DHSC policy documents (for example, Core20Plus5, NHS Long Term Plan, Digital Prevention Strategy)
  • public health literature
  • independent pilot studies
  • past user research

But I think what you've suggested is an improvement on what's currently written. If you're not a fan of the combined list.

@frankieroberto frankieroberto temporarily deployed to screening-de-lung-healt-fesvvh June 25, 2025 15:57 Inactive
@ralph-hawkins ralph-hawkins marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2025 15:58
@frankieroberto frankieroberto temporarily deployed to screening-de-lung-healt-fesvvh June 25, 2025 16:06 Inactive
@ralph-hawkins ralph-hawkins merged commit 54c4865 into main Jun 26, 2025
2 checks passed
@ralph-hawkins ralph-hawkins deleted the lung-health-check-first-post branch June 26, 2025 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants