Skip to content

Commit 30e636a

Browse files
committed
Open issue deep dive: wave 3 long-tail plan (#2812)
- Add Wave 3 execution plan for 19 long-tail backlog issues that had no open PR at snapshot time. - Stacked on top of #2811 to preserve mergeable review slices. - Not run (documentation/analysis only). - Refs #2527 - Refs #2524 - Refs #1999 - Refs #1985 - Refs #1959 - Refs #1958 - Refs #1949 - Refs #1929 - Refs #1862 - Refs #1828 - Refs #1746 - Refs #1692 - Refs #1658 - Refs #1627 - Refs #1590 - Refs #1583 - Refs #1468 - Refs #1465 - Refs #1196 <!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY --> --- > [!NOTE] > **Low Risk** > Low risk because it only adds an analysis/markdown planning document and does not change runtime, build, or CI behavior. > > **Overview** > Adds `analysis/open-issue-deep-dive/wave-3-long-tail.md`, documenting the Wave 3 execution plan for **19 long-tail issues** from the 2026-03-22 triage snapshot. > > The doc includes a domain breakdown, notes on issues resolved as duplicates after the snapshot, and per-issue triage context plus the *exact* follow-up question posted to each issue. > > <sup>Written by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit 75c95ed. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure [here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup> <!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> * **Documentation** * Added Wave 3 Long-Tail Issues report documenting open issues without active pull requests, including domain analysis, issue metadata, labels, creation dates, and triage context. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
1 parent 8b484cb commit 30e636a

1 file changed

Lines changed: 9 additions & 9 deletions

File tree

analysis/open-issue-deep-dive/wave-3-long-tail.md

Lines changed: 9 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ Field note: `Posted question` is the exact question posted to each issue during
66

77
## Domain Breakdown (19 Issues)
88

9-
| Domain | Count |
10-
| ------------------- | ----- |
11-
| core/runtime | 9 |
12-
| ci/tooling | 4 |
13-
| documentation | 4 |
14-
| discussion/rfc | 1 |
15-
| pro/rsc integration | 1 |
9+
| Domain | Count |
10+
| -------------------- | ----- |
11+
| core/runtime | 9 |
12+
| ci/tooling | 4 |
13+
| documentation | 4 |
14+
| discussion/rfc | 1 |
15+
| pro/rsc integration | 1 |
1616

1717
## Resolved After Snapshot, Before Execution
1818

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Field note: `Posted question` is the exact question posted to each issue during
4848
- Domain: documentation
4949
- Labels: documentation, P3
5050
- Created: 2025-11-12
51-
- Context excerpt: ## Overview Add compelling React Server Components (RSC) migration success stories to our documentation to give readers incentive to migrate. ## Success Stories to Feature ### 1. **Mux: 50,000 Lines Migrated** - \*\*Articl ...
51+
- Context excerpt: ## Overview Add compelling React Server Components (RSC) migration success stories to our documentation to give readers incentive to migrate. ## Success Stories to Feature ### 1. **Mux: 50,000 Lines Migrated** - **Articl ...
5252
- Posted question: Should this be batched with related docs issues in a single docs PR, or handled separately?
5353

5454
## #1959 CI/Build improvements: prepack scripts and yalc workflow fixes
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ Field note: `Posted question` is the exact question posted to each issue during
129129
- Domain: core/runtime
130130
- Labels: P3
131131
- Created: 2024-06-08
132-
- Context excerpt: `ruby ReactOnRails::PacksGenerator.instance.generate_packs_if_stale ` Have this call create a lock file so it can't run concurrently. The lock file should expire within a short time. Here is how to do this: https://w ...
132+
- Context excerpt: ```ruby ReactOnRails::PacksGenerator.instance.generate_packs_if_stale ``` Have this call create a lock file so it can't run concurrently. The lock file should expire within a short time. Here is how to do this: https://w ...
133133
- Posted question: Do you want this scheduled in the next implementation wave, or parked until after active release work?
134134

135135
## #1590 Add support for Vite

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)