|
| 1 | +\documentclass{ximera} |
| 2 | +\input{../preamble.tex} |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +\title{Vectors and their Representations} \license{CC BY-NC-SA 4.0} |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +\begin{document} |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +\begin{abstract} |
| 9 | +\end{abstract} |
| 10 | +\maketitle |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +\begin{onlineOnly} |
| 13 | +\section*{Vectors and their Representations} |
| 14 | +\end{onlineOnly} |
| 15 | +We will start our Linear Algebra journey with a very important point. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +\begin{center} |
| 18 | + \begin{tikzpicture} |
| 19 | + \fill (0,0) circle (2pt) node[above right] {$P=$ very important point}; |
| 20 | +\end{tikzpicture} |
| 21 | +\end{center} |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +How would you describe the location of $P$? Whether you reference the edges of the page or introduce your own set of axes, you will find that (1) a fixed reference system is required to describe the location, and (2) the resulting description may differ from someone else’s, since different choices of coordinate system lead to different representations. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +\begin{idea} |
| 26 | +A mathematical object is distinct from its representation. A single object may have a multitude of representations that depend on convention and convenience. |
| 27 | +\end{idea} |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +\subsection*{How to Create a Coordinate System} |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +When you first encountered vectors in your earlier courses it was probably assumed that these vectors exist in some established rectangular coordinate system. Such a coordinate system implicitly postulates the following |
| 32 | +\begin{itemize} |
| 33 | + \item Location of the origin |
| 34 | + \item Unit of length |
| 35 | + \item Orthogonality of axes |
| 36 | +\end{itemize} |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +Representation of points and vectors was dictated by the established coordinate system. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +What if we started from scratch? Take two vectors, choose the location of the origin, then use the two vectors to create a coordinate grid. The interactive below allows you to move points $A$ and $B$ to create two vectors. Move the slider to see how different points in the plane can be represented using this coordinate grid, and how the representation of a fixed point changes depending on what grid is chosen. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +% https://www.geogebra.org/classic/edcyushm |
| 43 | +\begin{center} |
| 44 | + \geogebra{edcyushm}{800}{600} |
| 45 | +\end{center} |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +When using an alternative coordinate system, it is customary to identify the vectors that determine it. For now, we will say that the coordinates of point $P$ are stated with respect to $\{\overrightarrow{OA}, \overrightarrow{OB}\}$. We will refine this statement later in the text. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +\begin{exploration}\label{exp:coordSystemLinCombs1} |
| 50 | +Use the interactive below to answer questions about the coordinates of points with respect to various coordinate systems. |
| 51 | +% https://www.geogebra.org/classic/qw5dpmqq |
| 52 | +\begin{center} |
| 53 | + \geogebra{qw5dpmqq}{800}{600} |
| 54 | +\end{center} |
| 55 | +\begin{question} |
| 56 | + List the coordinates for each $P_i$ with respect to the given coordinate system. Your coordinates should be of the form $(\overrightarrow{OA}\text{-coordinate}, \overrightarrow{OB}\text{-coordinate})$. |
| 57 | + $$P_1=\left(\answer{1},\answer{1}\right)$$ |
| 58 | + $$P_2=\left(\answer{-2},\answer{0}\right)$$ |
| 59 | + $$P_3=\left(\answer{0},\answer{-1}\right)$$ |
| 60 | + $$P_4=\left(\answer{-2},\answer{3}\right)$$ |
| 61 | + $$P_5=\left(\answer{3},\answer{-2}\right)$$ |
| 62 | +\end{question} |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +\begin{question} |
| 65 | +REFRESH your browser to return to the original coordinate system. Move point $A$ to coincide with $P_1$ |
| 66 | + List the coordinates for each $P_i$ with respect to the new coordinate system. |
| 67 | + $$P_1=\left(\answer{1},\answer{0}\right)$$ |
| 68 | + $$P_2=\left(\answer{-2},\answer{2}\right)$$ |
| 69 | + $$P_3=\left(\answer{0},\answer{-1}\right)$$ |
| 70 | + $$P_4=\left(\answer{-2},\answer{5}\right)$$ |
| 71 | + $$P_5=\left(\answer{3},\answer{-5}\right)$$ |
| 72 | + How do these coordinates compare to the coordinates in the original coordinate system? Explain why this is happening. (Hint: REFRESH your browser to return to the original coordinate system to compare.) |
| 73 | +\end{question} |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +\begin{question} |
| 76 | +Move point $B$ to coincide with $P_3$ |
| 77 | + List the coordinates for each $P_i$ with respect to the new coordinate system. |
| 78 | + $$P_1=\left(\answer{1},\answer{-1}\right)$$ |
| 79 | + $$P_2=\left(\answer{-2},\answer{0}\right)$$ |
| 80 | + $$P_3=\left(\answer{0},\answer{1}\right)$$ |
| 81 | + $$P_4=\left(\answer{-2},\answer{-3}\right)$$ |
| 82 | + $$P_5=\left(\answer{3},\answer{2}\right)$$ |
| 83 | + How do these coordinates compare to the coordinates in the previous question? Explain why this is happening. (Hint: REFRESH your browser to return to the original coordinate system to compare.) |
| 84 | +\end{question} |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +% \begin{question} |
| 87 | +% REFRESH your browser to return to the original coordinate system. Express each $\overrightarrow{OP}_i$ as a linear combination of $\overrightarrow{OA}$ and $\overrightarrow{OB}$. |
| 88 | +% $$\overrightarrow{OP}_1=\answer{1}\overrightarrow{OA}+\answer{1}\overrightarrow{OB}$$ |
| 89 | +% $$\overrightarrow{OP}_2=\answer{-2}\overrightarrow{OA}+\answer{0}\overrightarrow{OB}$$ |
| 90 | +% $$\overrightarrow{OP}_3=\answer{0}\overrightarrow{OA}+\answer{-1}\overrightarrow{OB}$$ |
| 91 | +% $$\overrightarrow{OP}_4=\answer{-2}\overrightarrow{OA}+\answer{3}\overrightarrow{OB}$$ |
| 92 | +% $$\overrightarrow{OP}_5=\answer{3}\overrightarrow{OA}+\answer{-2}\overrightarrow{OB}$$ |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +% Discuss the relationship between your answers to the first question and your answers here. |
| 95 | +% \end{question} |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +\begin{question} |
| 98 | + Move point $B$ to coincide with $P_2$. What do you observe? Do vectors $\overrightarrow{OA}$ and $\overrightarrow{OB}$ determine a good coordinate system for the plane? Can we express every point in the plane with respect to the coordinate system determined by $\{\overrightarrow{OA}, \overrightarrow{OB}\}$? Can we express \textit{some} points in the plane with respect to the coordinate system determined by $\{\overrightarrow{OA}, \overrightarrow{OB}\}$? |
| 99 | +\end{question} |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +\end{exploration} |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +\begin{exploration}\label{exp:coordSystemLinCombs2} |
| 104 | +We will use the same set-up as in the previous exploration but introduce an additional vector $\overrightarrow{OC}$. |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | + % https://www.geogebra.org/classic/b3k96x2w |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | + \begin{center} |
| 109 | + \geogebra{b3k96x2w}{800}{600} |
| 110 | + \end{center} |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | + \begin{question} |
| 113 | + Suppose we want to express $P_1$ using a coordinate system determined by three vectors $\overrightarrow{OA}$, $\overrightarrow{OB}$, and $\overrightarrow{OC}$. If the coordinates are to be of the form $(\overrightarrow{OA}\text{-coordinate}, \overrightarrow{OB}\text{-coordinate}, \overrightarrow{OC}\text{-coordinate})$, how many ways do you think there would be to express $P_1$? Fill in the missing coordinates for $P_1$ below. |
| 114 | + $$P_1=\left(\answer{1},\answer{1},0\right)$$ |
| 115 | + $$P_1=\left(0,\answer{2},\answer{0.5}\right)$$ |
| 116 | + $$P_1=\left(\answer{2}, 0, \answer{-0.5}\right)$$ |
| 117 | + $$P_1=\left(\answer{3},-1,-1\right)$$ |
| 118 | + \end{question} |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | + % \begin{question} |
| 121 | + % Based on your work above, express $\overrightarrow{OP_1}$ as a linear combination of $\overrightarrow{OA}$, $\overrightarrow{OB}$, and $\overrightarrow{OC}$. How many ways do you think there are to do this? |
| 122 | + % \end{question} |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | + \begin{question} |
| 125 | + Compare and contrast the coordinate systems in this exploration and Exploration \ref{exp:coordSystemLinCombs1}. |
| 126 | + \end{question} |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +\end{exploration} |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +What we learned is that not all collections of vectors are adequate for making a useful coordinate system. In Exploration \ref{exp:coordSystemLinCombs1} we learned that if two vectors are collinear, then not all points in the plane can be represented with respect to those two vectors. In Exploration \ref{exp:coordSystemLinCombs2} we found that having too many vectors results in a point having infinitely many representations, which would be computationally confusing. |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +\begin{idea} |
| 133 | + What makes a good coordinate system? |
| 134 | + \begin{itemize} |
| 135 | + \item Every point has coordinates associated with it; |
| 136 | + \item The set of coordinates associated with each point is unique. |
| 137 | + \end{itemize} |
| 138 | +\end{idea} |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +\end{document} |
0 commit comments