Skip to content

Commit 688d306

Browse files
authored
Update nextjs-default e2e fixture lockfile for security advisories (#29926)
## Description Updates vulnerable dev/test npm dependencies in the `nextjs-default` export e2e fixture lockfile. Follow-up to #29827, which covered the other five lockfiles but not this one. ## Updates - `next` `15.5.18` -> `15.5.22` - `postcss` `8.5.14` -> `8.5.24` - `nanoid` `3.3.12` -> `3.3.16` Modified lockfile: - `js/web/test/e2e/exports/testcases/nextjs-default/package-lock.json` `next` 15.5.18 predates the `15.5.21` security release co-published with `16.2.11`, so the fixture still resolved to a version affected by the CVE-2026-64641..64649 advisory batch. `postcss` 8.5.14 is likewise inside the affected range (`<= 8.5.17`) for CVE-2026-45623. Note the fixture intentionally tracks the `15.x` line (`next: ^15.0.0` in package.json, per #28547), so `15.5.22` — not `16.2.11` — is the correct target. No package manifests or runtime source files are changed. The resolved dependency set is unchanged (identical package keys before/after); the diff is purely `version`/`resolved`/`integrity`. ## Validation - Regenerated with `npm audit fix --package-lock-only` against `registry.npmjs.org`; verified zero `resolved` URLs point anywhere else. - `npm audit --package-lock-only` no longer reports `next` or `postcss` advisories; the diff is a balanced 46 insertions / 46 deletions. - Confirmed package key sets are identical pre/post, so no dependency was added or dropped. - Preserved `libc` metadata that npm >= 11.6 drops when rewriting lockfiles (the packages still declare it), keeping musl/glibc optional-dep selection intact for the `@next/swc-linux-*` binaries.
1 parent 40cba38 commit 688d306

1 file changed

Lines changed: 46 additions & 46 deletions

File tree

js/web/test/e2e/exports/testcases/nextjs-default/package-lock.json

Lines changed: 46 additions & 46 deletions
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about customizing how changed files appear on GitHub.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)