Client side capture ❤️ so much potential #2844
say-no-to-deer-pressure
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
|
I can understand that video downloading wouldn't work, but AI tagging should work just fine though. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Just noticed the client side capture option in the Chrome extension opitons, which worked way better for Reddit posts than server side capture and the SingleFile extension integration. Captured the page in proper dark mode and grabbed a ton of comments. Formatting was perfect!
But from what I can tell, the client side capture isn't integrated with anything server side: AI tagging didn't occur, and the video file wasn't generated.
I'm hoping down the line we can get a best of both worlds approcach - client side capture for the site itself (PDF, archive reader view), and leave the server to grab the video and tag the site.
Really looking forward to this feature when it's more developed!
All reactions