Commit ef26891
committed
RFC: Fix ambiguity with null variable values and default values
> This is a **behavioral change** which changes how explicit `null` values interact with variable and argument default values. This also changes a validation rule which makes the rule more strict.
There is currently ambiguity and inconsistency in how `null` values are coerced and resolved as part of variable values, default values, and argument values. This inconsistency and ambiguity can allow for `null` values to appear at non-null arguments, which might result in unforseen null-pointer-errors.
This appears in three distinct but related issues:
**Validation: All Variable Usages are Allowed**
The explicit value `null` may be used as a default value for a variable with a nullable type, however this rule asks to treat a variable's type as non-null if it has a default value. Instead this rule should specifically only treat the variable's type as non-null if the default value is not `null`.
Additionally, the `AreTypesCompatible` algorithm is underspecificied, which could lead to further misinterpretation of this validation rule.
**Coercing Variable Values**
`CoerceVariableValues()` allows the explicit `null` value to be used instead of a default value. This can result in a null value flowing to a non-null argument due to the validation rule mentioned above. Instead a default value must be used even when an explicit `null` value is provided. This is also more consistent with the explanation for validation rule "Variable Default Value Is Allowed"
Also, how to treat an explicit `null` value is currently underspecified. While an input object explains that a `null` value should result in an explicit `null` value at the input object field, there is no similar explaination for typical scalar input types. Instead, `CoerceVariableValues()` should explicitly handle the `null` value to make it clear a `null` is the resulting value in the `coercedValues` Map.
**Coercing Argument Values**
The `CoerceArgumentValues()` algorithm is intentionally similar to `CoerceVariableValues()` and suffers from the same inconsistency. Explicit `null` values should not take precedence over default values, and should also be explicitly handled rather than left to underspecified input scalar coercion.1 parent 54df48d commit ef26891
2 files changed
Lines changed: 75 additions & 46 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1836 | 1836 | | |
1837 | 1837 | | |
1838 | 1838 | | |
1839 | | - | |
1840 | | - | |
1841 | | - | |
1842 | | - | |
1843 | | - | |
1844 | | - | |
1845 | | - | |
1846 | | - | |
1847 | | - | |
1848 | | - | |
1849 | | - | |
| 1839 | + | |
| 1840 | + | |
| 1841 | + | |
| 1842 | + | |
| 1843 | + | |
| 1844 | + | |
| 1845 | + | |
| 1846 | + | |
| 1847 | + | |
| 1848 | + | |
| 1849 | + | |
| 1850 | + | |
| 1851 | + | |
| 1852 | + | |
| 1853 | + | |
| 1854 | + | |
| 1855 | + | |
| 1856 | + | |
| 1857 | + | |
| 1858 | + | |
| 1859 | + | |
| 1860 | + | |
| 1861 | + | |
| 1862 | + | |
| 1863 | + | |
| 1864 | + | |
| 1865 | + | |
1850 | 1866 | | |
1851 | 1867 | | |
1852 | 1868 | | |
| |||
1890 | 1906 | | |
1891 | 1907 | | |
1892 | 1908 | | |
1893 | | - | |
1894 | | - | |
| 1909 | + | |
| 1910 | + | |
1895 | 1911 | | |
1896 | 1912 | | |
1897 | 1913 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
82 | 82 | | |
83 | 83 | | |
84 | 84 | | |
| 85 | + | |
85 | 86 | | |
86 | | - | |
87 | | - | |
88 | | - | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
89 | 94 | | |
90 | 95 | | |
91 | | - | |
92 | | - | |
93 | | - | |
94 | | - | |
95 | | - | |
96 | | - | |
97 | | - | |
98 | | - | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
| 104 | + | |
| 105 | + | |
99 | 106 | | |
100 | 107 | | |
101 | 108 | | |
| |||
530 | 537 | | |
531 | 538 | | |
532 | 539 | | |
533 | | - | |
534 | | - | |
| 540 | + | |
| 541 | + | |
535 | 542 | | |
536 | 543 | | |
537 | 544 | | |
| |||
543 | 550 | | |
544 | 551 | | |
545 | 552 | | |
546 | | - | |
547 | | - | |
548 | | - | |
549 | | - | |
550 | | - | |
551 | | - | |
552 | | - | |
| 553 | + | |
| 554 | + | |
| 555 | + | |
| 556 | + | |
| 557 | + | |
| 558 | + | |
553 | 559 | | |
554 | | - | |
| 560 | + | |
555 | 561 | | |
| 562 | + | |
| 563 | + | |
| 564 | + | |
| 565 | + | |
| 566 | + | |
| 567 | + | |
| 568 | + | |
| 569 | + | |
| 570 | + | |
| 571 | + | |
556 | 572 | | |
557 | | - | |
558 | | - | |
559 | | - | |
560 | | - | |
| 573 | + | |
| 574 | + | |
561 | 575 | | |
562 | | - | |
563 | | - | |
564 | | - | |
565 | | - | |
566 | | - | |
567 | | - | |
568 | | - | |
569 | | - | |
| 576 | + | |
| 577 | + | |
| 578 | + | |
| 579 | + | |
| 580 | + | |
| 581 | + | |
| 582 | + | |
570 | 583 | | |
571 | 584 | | |
572 | 585 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments