feat(word): add sample method

[pkuczynski]

Fixes #276

Fixes #339

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #714 (de9f2d6) into next (666ff02) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 92.40%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next     #714      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.64%   99.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2214     2214              
  Lines      238741   238813      +72     
  Branches     1023     1029       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits       237885   237951      +66     
- Misses        835      841       +6     
  Partials       21       21              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/modules/word/index.ts	98.47% <92.00%> (-1.53%)	⬇️
src/modules/helpers/index.ts	98.51% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/system/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[pkuczynski]

@Shinigami92 anything else missing to get this merged?

[Shinigami92]

Yes, all the v6.1 targeted things to be merged I assume 🤔

[pkuczynski]

Yes, all the v6.1 targeted things to be merged I assume 🤔

Not sure if we should be so stick to the 6.1 is only bug fixes as keeping PRs open for longer time means potential conflicts and maintenance, so I would be in favor of merging things as soon as they ready...

[ST-DDT]

Yes, all the v6.1 targeted things to be merged I assume 🤔

Not sure if we should be so stick to the 6.1 is only bug fixes as keeping PRs open for longer time means potential conflicts and maintenance

That is true. Is is a small feature, requiring low effort for maintaining the PR from you.

so I would be in favor of merging things as soon as they ready...

If we merge this one, then we have to explain why we didn't merge other features.
Sure we could start merging them all, but then everyone would start creating new PRs with new super fancy features
and we have to somehow interweave the required bug fix merges with the nice to have feature requests.
Also people tend to prefer adding features over fixing bugs.

We use the milestones as a means to communicate the order we discussed on when to tackle things/fix/add...
This feature being in v6.2 has been discussed/communicated a few months ago, we don't want to discourage anyone in contributing to the project, so we don't ban PRs for future milestones, but I hope you can understand that this may cause you additional work to maintain them for the time being.

We hope to finish all fixes/PRs for 6.1 by this Monday evening, so you don't have to maintain it forever either.

[pkuczynski]

Fair enough :)

[ST-DDT]

To consider: Handle "empty" locale
This method should at least not behave worse than the other word methods.
Ref: #770 (comment)

[ST-DDT]

Done. Ready for Review.