chore: bump node version and set openssl-legacy-provider

[zachaller]

This PR fixes the build pipeline again because of changes in github runners that upgrade node to version 18 actions/runner-images#7002 this caused
isses with hash generation functions that were depricated.

This turns on the legacy hash until I can spend time debugging front end deps.

Created an issue to track fixing this all properly #2609

This was the error from pipeline

$ rm -rf dist && webpack --config ./src/app/webpack.prod.js
/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:133
		if(isError) throw e;
		            ^

Error: error:0308010C:digital envelope routines::unsupported
    at new Hash (node:internal/crypto/hash:71:19)
    at Object.createHash (node:crypto:133:10)
    at module.exports (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/webpack/lib/util/createHash.js:135:53)
    at NormalModule._initBuildHash (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:417:16)
    at handleParseError (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:471:10)
    at /home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:503:5
    at /home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/webpack/lib/NormalModule.js:358:12
    at /home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:373:3
    at iterateNormalLoaders (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:214:10)
    at iterateNormalLoaders (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:221:10)
    at /home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:236:3
    at context.callback (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:111:13)
    at makeSourceMapAndFinish (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/ts-loader/dist/index.js:58:5)
    at successLoader (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/ts-loader/dist/index.js:40:5)
    at Object.loader (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/ts-loader/dist/index.js:23:5)
    at LOADER_EXECUTION (/home/runner/work/argo-rollouts/argo-rollouts/ui/node_modules/loader-runner/lib/LoaderRunner.js:119:14) {
  opensslErrorStack: [ 'error:03000086:digital envelope routines::initialization error' ],
  library: 'digital envelope routines',
  reason: 'unsupported',
  code: 'ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED'
}

[github-actions]

Go Published Test Results

1 859 tests   1 859 ✔️  2m 31s ⏱️
   113 suites         0 💤
       1 files           0 ❌

Results for commit e9541b3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2E Tests Published Test Results

    2 files      2 suites   1h 42m 27s ⏱️
  96 tests   89 ✔️ 3 💤 4 ❌
196 runs  186 ✔️ 6 💤 4 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit e9541b3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
2.1% Duplication

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 81.52% // Head: 81.52% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (e9541b3) compared to base (e79d1ca).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2606   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.52%   81.52%           
=======================================
  Files         131      131           
  Lines       19562    19562           
=======================================
  Hits        15947    15947           
  Misses       2795     2795           
  Partials      820      820           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[agrawroh]

Thanks for fixing this! @zachaller Would you work on #2609? Otherwise I can also look into it.

[zachaller]

I would love the help looking into it I don't have much webpack experience.

[leoluz]

LGTM