The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` 就会在 agent 运行前失败该步骤，与 #9761 完全相同。已知位点的漂移确实能被清点计数捕捉，仓库的钉住孪生（pinned-twin）约定也是已获认可的替代方案——因此这里标记的是重复的成本，供集中化决策：把一个 sed 程序（如 `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`）检入仓库并在所有回显点使用 `sed -f`，或在共享同一进程的位点间使用每脚本函数，然后让清点指向该定义，使新位点能被机械地捕捉，而不是依赖流程自觉。' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command '**[Suggestion]** 此行所属的消毒器在 4 个文件的 16 个生产位点被手工复制（工作流 7 处、验证门脚本 6 处、deferred-findings 脚本 2 处、此处 1 处），守护它的清点测试只钉住了已知枚举——它自己的注释也承认“新的回显点不会被自动发现”。本 PR 正是这种形态的成本：一个新发现的可解析语法迫使全部 16 处加测试正则同步修改，未来任何语法变化都会重复这次 N 处编辑。未设防的方向是新增位点——未来任何把 `cat "${WORKDIR}/…"` 原样回显到 stdout 的调用都能通过这里新增的所有断言（禁用拼写检查只捕捉三种旧拼写），评审文本里下一个被引用的 `##[add-matcher]` 就会在 agent 运行前失败该步骤，与 #9761 完全相同。已知位点的漂移确实能被清点计数捕捉，仓库的钉住孪生（pinned-twin）约定也是已获认可的替代方案——因此这里标记的是重复的成本，供集中化决策：把一个 sed 程序（如 `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`）检入仓库并在所有回显点使用 `sed -f`，或在共享同一进程的位点间使用每脚本函数，然后让清点指向该定义，使新位点能被机械地捕捉，而不是依赖流程自觉。' successfully.

The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` in reviewer text fails the step before the agent runs, exactly as #9761 did. Known-site drift IS caught by the census counts, and the repo's pinned-twin convention is the acknowledged alternative — so this is the cost of the duplication, flagged for a centralization call: check in one sed program (e.g. `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`) and use `sed -f` at every echo site, or a per-script function where sites share a process, then point the census at the definition so new sites are caught mechanically instead of by process discipline.' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command '- [rc:3844052781] .github/scripts/autofix-push-and-report.sh:342 @qwen-code-ci-bot: **[Suggestion]** The neutralizer this line belongs to is hand-copied at 16 production sites across 4 files (7 in the workflow, 6 in the verification gate, 2 in the deferred-findings script, 1 here), and the census test guarding it pins only the known enumeration — its own comment concedes "a NEW echo site is NOT auto-detected". This PR is the cost of that shape: one newly-discovered parsed syntax forced a lockstep edit of all 16 sites plus the test regexes, and any future syntax change repeats that N-site edit. The unguarded direction is a NEW site — a future raw `cat "${WORKDIR}/…"` stdout echo passes every assertion added here (the banned-spelling checks catch only the three old spellings), and the next quoted `##[add-matcher]` in reviewer text fails the step before the agent runs, exactly as #9761 did. Known-site drift IS caught by the census counts, and the repo's pinned-twin convention is the acknowledged alternative — so this is the cost of the duplication, flagged for a centralization call: check in one sed program (e.g. `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`) and use `sed -f` at every echo site, or a per-script function where sites share a process, then point the census at the definition so new sites are caught mechanically instead of by process discipline.' successfully.

The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` 的评审评论搭乘新回显点进入步骤 stdout，runner 在行中将其解析，步骤在 agent 运行前失败——正是本 PR 要消除的故障模式，而且它已经发生过一次（在触发本次修复的事故之前，prepare 步骤曾裸回显 `feedback.md`，而其他兄弟站点只有 `;;` 单语法消毒）。' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command '具体故障：未来某个 PR 以这些形态之一新增了一处面向 stdout 的 agent/评审者内容回显，并信任这个 census 作为守卫。测试保持绿色；某条引用了 `##[add-matcher]` 的评审评论搭乘新回显点进入步骤 stdout，runner 在行中将其解析，步骤在 agent 运行前失败——正是本 PR 要消除的故障模式，而且它已经发生过一次（在触发本次修复的事故之前，prepare 步骤曾裸回显 `feedback.md`，而其他兄弟站点只有 `;;` 单语法消毒）。' successfully.

The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` rides the new echo to step stdout, the runner parses it mid-line, and the step dies pre-agent — the exact failure mode this PR exists to prevent, which already occurred once (before the motivating incident, the prepare step echoed `feedback.md` raw while sibling sites carried `;;`-only sed).' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command 'Concrete failure: a future PR adds a stdout echo of agent/reviewer content in one of those shapes, trusting this census as the guard. The test stays green; a reviewer comment quoting `##[add-matcher]` rides the new echo to step stdout, the runner parses it mid-line, and the step dies pre-agent — the exact failure mode this PR exists to prevent, which already occurred once (before the motivating incident, the prepare step echoed `feedback.md` raw while sibling sites carried `;;`-only sed).' successfully.

Could not find file '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/ payload; a failing run re-injects it into CI stdout`'.

Unable to process command '- `scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js:13908 — [probe] behavioral test embeds the live ##[add-matcher] payload; a failing run re-injects it into CI stdout`' successfully.

Process completed with exit code 1.

Process completed with exit code 1.

The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` 就会在 agent 运行前失败该步骤，与 #9761 完全相同。已知位点的漂移确实能被清点计数捕捉，仓库的钉住孪生（pinned-twin）约定也是已获认可的替代方案——因此这里标记的是重复的成本，供集中化决策：把一个 sed 程序（如 `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`）检入仓库并在所有回显点使用 `sed -f`，或在共享同一进程的位点间使用每脚本函数，然后让清点指向该定义，使新位点能被机械地捕捉，而不是依赖流程自觉。' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command '**[Suggestion]** 此行所属的消毒器在 4 个文件的 16 个生产位点被手工复制（工作流 7 处、验证门脚本 6 处、deferred-findings 脚本 2 处、此处 1 处），守护它的清点测试只钉住了已知枚举——它自己的注释也承认“新的回显点不会被自动发现”。本 PR 正是这种形态的成本：一个新发现的可解析语法迫使全部 16 处加测试正则同步修改，未来任何语法变化都会重复这次 N 处编辑。未设防的方向是新增位点——未来任何把 `cat "${WORKDIR}/…"` 原样回显到 stdout 的调用都能通过这里新增的所有断言（禁用拼写检查只捕捉三种旧拼写），评审文本里下一个被引用的 `##[add-matcher]` 就会在 agent 运行前失败该步骤，与 #9761 完全相同。已知位点的漂移确实能被清点计数捕捉，仓库的钉住孪生（pinned-twin）约定也是已获认可的替代方案——因此这里标记的是重复的成本，供集中化决策：把一个 sed 程序（如 `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`）检入仓库并在所有回显点使用 `sed -f`，或在共享同一进程的位点间使用每脚本函数，然后让清点指向该定义，使新位点能被机械地捕捉，而不是依赖流程自觉。' successfully.

The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` in reviewer text fails the step before the agent runs, exactly as #9761 did. Known-site drift IS caught by the census counts, and the repo's pinned-twin convention is the acknowledged alternative — so this is the cost of the duplication, flagged for a centralization call: check in one sed program (e.g. `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`) and use `sed -f` at every echo site, or a per-script function where sites share a process, then point the census at the definition so new sites are caught mechanically instead of by process discipline.' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command '- [rc:3844052781] .github/scripts/autofix-push-and-report.sh:342 @qwen-code-ci-bot: **[Suggestion]** The neutralizer this line belongs to is hand-copied at 16 production sites across 4 files (7 in the workflow, 6 in the verification gate, 2 in the deferred-findings script, 1 here), and the census test guarding it pins only the known enumeration — its own comment concedes "a NEW echo site is NOT auto-detected". This PR is the cost of that shape: one newly-discovered parsed syntax forced a lockstep edit of all 16 sites plus the test regexes, and any future syntax change repeats that N-site edit. The unguarded direction is a NEW site — a future raw `cat "${WORKDIR}/…"` stdout echo passes every assertion added here (the banned-spelling checks catch only the three old spellings), and the next quoted `##[add-matcher]` in reviewer text fails the step before the agent runs, exactly as #9761 did. Known-site drift IS caught by the census counts, and the repo's pinned-twin convention is the acknowledged alternative — so this is the cost of the duplication, flagged for a centralization call: check in one sed program (e.g. `.github/scripts/workflow-command-defuse.sed`) and use `sed -f` at every echo site, or a per-script function where sites share a process, then point the census at the definition so new sites are caught mechanically instead of by process discipline.' successfully.

The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` 的评审评论搭乘新回显点进入步骤 stdout，runner 在行中将其解析，步骤在 agent 运行前失败——正是本 PR 要消除的故障模式，而且它已经发生过一次（在触发本次修复的事故之前，prepare 步骤曾裸回显 `feedback.md`，而其他兄弟站点只有 `::` 单语法消毒）。' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command '具体故障：未来某个 PR 以这些形态之一新增了一处面向 stdout 的 agent/评审者内容回显，并信任这个 census 作为守卫。测试保持绿色；某条引用了 `##[add-matcher]` 的评审评论搭乘新回显点进入步骤 stdout，runner 在行中将其解析，步骤在 agent 运行前失败——正是本 PR 要消除的故障模式，而且它已经发生过一次（在触发本次修复的事故之前，prepare 步骤曾裸回显 `feedback.md`，而其他兄弟站点只有 `::` 单语法消毒）。' successfully.

The path '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/` rides the new echo to step stdout, the runner parses it mid-line, and the step dies pre-agent — the exact failure mode this PR exists to prevent, which already occurred once (before the motivating incident, the prepare step echoed `feedback.md` raw while sibling sites carried `::`-only sed).' is too long, or a component of the specified path is too long.

Unable to process command 'Concrete failure: a future PR adds a stdout echo of agent/reviewer content in one of those shapes, trusting this census as the guard. The test stays green; a reviewer comment quoting `##[add-matcher]` rides the new echo to step stdout, the runner parses it mid-line, and the step dies pre-agent — the exact failure mode this PR exists to prevent, which already occurred once (before the motivating incident, the prepare step echoed `feedback.md` raw while sibling sites carried `::`-only sed).' successfully.

Could not find file '/home/github-runner/actions-runner-hk-j6c03lyei7s809zq1s6u-19/_work/qwen-code/qwen-code/ payload; a failing run re-injects it into CI stdout`'.

Unable to process command '- `scripts/tests/qwen-autofix-workflow.test.js:13908 — [probe] behavioral test embeds the live ##[add-matcher] payload; a failing run re-injects it into CI stdout`' successfully.

.github/workflows/orphan.yml has no entry in

Process completed with exit code 1.

the commits pushed during the run conflict with this fix — handing off instead of overwriting either side