Concurrent & remaining docs suggestions (#16)

* docs edits
index
getting started
problem it solves

Base docs suggestions as per the commit message. Will open a separate PR for the other stuff I'd suggest in general.

* made minor/moderate wording changes from the Usage Examples and API References sections, including the text represnted in code which has been COMMENTED OUT, NOT THE CODE ITSELF

* Docs changes to API Reference section

* cleaned up testing section using lists, v small grammar changes for master_replica and concurrent_queries

---------

Co-authored-by: annibond <anni.simpson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: krylosov-aa <krylosov.andrew@gmail.com>

Author: 3 people

docs/api/index.html

@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ <h3 id="connect">connect</h3>
 </code></pre>
 <p>Establishes a connection to the specified host.
 It doesn’t need to be called explicitly.
-If you don't use the call, the first session request will automatically
+The first session request automatically
 establishes the connection.</p>
 <hr />
 <h3 id="change_host">change_host</h3>
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ <h3 id="set_test_context">set_test_context</h3>
 It is intended to test the application when it shares a single transaction.</p>
 <p>Use <code>auto_close=False</code> if you’re using a test session and transaction
 that you close elsewhere in your code.</p>
-<p>Use <code>auto_close=True</code> if you want to call a function
+<p>Use <code>auto_close=True</code> to call a function
 in a test that uses a context while the middleware is not
 active. All sessions close automatically.</p>
 <hr />
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ <h3 id="put_savepoint_session_in_ctx">put_savepoint_session_in_ctx</h3>
 <p>Sets the context to a session that uses a save point instead of creating
         a transaction. You need to pass the session you're using inside
         your tests to attach a new session to the same connection.</p>
+
 <pre><code>It is important to use this function inside set_test_context.
 </code></pre>
 <p>Learn more about <a href="../testing/">testing</a></p>

docs/concurrent_queries/index.html

@@ -104,11 +104,11 @@
                 <h1 id="concurrent-sql-queries">Concurrent sql queries</h1>
 <p>Concurrent query execution deserves special attention.
 In SQLAlchemy, you can’t run multiple queries concurrently within the same
-session - you need to create a new one.</p>
+session. You need to create a new one.</p>
 <p>The library provides two simple ways to execute queries concurrently:</p>
 <ul>
-<li>Run a function in a new context - <code>run_in_new_ctx</code></li>
-<li>Create a new session that is completely independent of the current context -
+<li>Run a function in a new context: <code>run_in_new_ctx</code></li>
+<li>Create a new session that is independent of the current context:
 <code>new_non_ctx_atomic_session</code> or <code>new_non_ctx_session</code></li>
 </ul>
 <pre><code class="language-python">import asyncio

docs/examples/index.html

@@ -223,8 +223,7 @@ <h3 id="manually-close-the-transaction-and-session">Manually close the transacti
 
     # We closed the transaction
     await commit_db_session(connection)
-
-    # We closed the session and returned the connection to the pool.
+    # We closed the session, which returned the connection to the pool automatically.
     # Use if you have more work you need to complete without keeping the connection open.
     await close_db_session(connection)
 
@@ -324,7 +323,7 @@ <h3 id="rollback">Rollback</h3>
     await session.execute(stmt)
 
     raise Exception(&quot;Some exception&quot;)
-    # transaction rolls back automatically
+    # transaction automatically rolls back
 </code></pre>
 <pre><code class="language-python">from fastapi import HTTPException
 

docs/master_replica/index.html

@@ -103,22 +103,24 @@
           <div role="main" class="document" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article">
             <div class="section" itemprop="articleBody">
 
-                <h1 id="masterreplica-or-several-databases-at-the-same-time">Master/Replica or several databases at the same time</h1>
-<p>This is why <code>db_session</code> and other functions accept a <code>DBConnect</code> instance as
-input.
-This approach allows you to work with multiple hosts simultaneously -
-for example, with both a master and a replica.</p>
-<p><code>DBConnect</code> can also accept factory functions instead of ready-made objects,
-making it easy to switch hosts when needed.</p>
-<p>For example, <code>libpq</code> can detect the master and replica when creating an engine,
+                <h1 id="masterreplica-or-several-databases-at-the-same-time">Using multiple databases at the same time (master/replica)</h1>
+                <p><code>db_session</code> and other functions accept a <code>DBConnect</code> instance as input. This approach allows you to work with multiple hosts simultaneously. This system allows you to manage scalability and version control.</p>
+                <ul>
+                  <li><b>Master:</b> The primary database which runs the "live" version of your information, the location of your primary data set. The master database
+                    handles INSERT, DELETE, and UPDATE API calls.
+                  </li>
+                  <li><b>Replicas:</b> Secondary database(s) which run READ-ONLY versions of your information and receive updates from the master database.</li>
+                </ul>
+<p><code>DBConnect</code> accepts factory functions instead of ready-made objects, making it easy to switch hosts when needed.</p>
+
+<p><code>libpq</code> can detect the master and replica when creating an engine,
 but it only does this once - at creation time.
-The before_create_session_handler hook allows you to change the host at
+The <code>before_create_session_handler</code> hook allows you to change the host at
 runtime if the master or replica changes.
-You’ll need third-party functionality to determine which host is the master
-or the replica.</p>
-<h4 id="i-have-an-extremely-lightweight-microservice-pg-status-that-fits-perfectly-here">I have an extremely lightweight microservice <a href="https://github.com/krylosov-aa/pg-status">pg-status</a> that fits perfectly here.</h4>
-<p>The engine is not created immediately when <code>DBConnect</code> is initialized -
-it is created only on the first request.
+
+<p><b>You need third-party functionality to determine which host is the master or the replica.</b></p>
+<h4 id="change_host">I have an extremely lightweight microservice <a href="https://github.com/krylosov-aa/pg-status">pg-status</a> that fits perfectly here</h4>
+<p>The engine is not created when <code>DBConnect</code> initializes, also known as lazy initialization. It is created only on the first request.
 The library uses lazy initialization in many places.</p>
 <pre><code class="language-python">from context_async_sqlalchemy import DBConnect
 

docs/search/search_index.json

@@ -106,47 +106,30 @@
             <div class="section" itemprop="articleBody">
 
                 <h1 id="testing">Testing</h1>
-<p>When testing with a real database, one important problem needs to be
-solved - ensuring data isolation between tests.</p>
-<p>There are basically two approaches:</p>
-<ol>
-<li>Separate sessions</li>
-</ol>
-<p>The test has its own session that it uses to prepare data and verify
-results after execution.
-The application also has its own session.
-Data isolation is achieved by clearing all tables at the end of each test
-(and once before running all tests).</p>
-<ol>
-<li>Shared session and transaction
-The test and the application share the same session and transaction.
-Data isolation is achieved by rolling back the transaction at
-the end of the test.</li>
-</ol>
-<p>Personally, I prefer the first option, because it is a more "honest" way
-to test the application.
-We can verify how it handles sessions and transactions on its own.
-It’s also convenient to inspect the database state when a test is paused.</p>
-<p>Sometimes, there are complex session management scenarios (for example,
-concurrent query execution) where other types of testing are either
-impossible or very difficult.</p>
-<p>The main disadvantage of this approach is the slower execution speed.
-Since we clear all tables after each test, this process takes additional time.</p>
-<p>This is where the second approach comes in - its main advantage is speed,
-as rolling back a transaction is very fast.</p>
+<p>When testing with a real database, one important problem needs to be solved: ensuring data isolation between tests. There are two approaches:
+  <ol>
+    <li><b>Separate sessions</b>: The test uses its own session that prepares data and verifies results after execution. The application also has its own session.
+    <ul>
+      <li>It is a more "honest" way to test the application.</li>
+      <li>Verifies how it handles sessions and transactions automatically.</li>
+      <li>The ability to inspect the database state when the test is paused.</li>
+      <li>Complex session management scenarios make other test methods difficult or impossible (e.g., concurrent query execution).</li>
+    </ul>
+    <li><b>Shared session and transaction:</b> The test and the application share the same session and transaction.
+    <ul>
+      <li>Rolling back transactions is faster and takes less time than starting a new session.</li>
+      </ul>
+  </ol>
+</p>
+
 <p>In my projects, I use both approaches at the same time:</p>
 <ul>
-<li>For most tests with simple or common logic, I use a shared transaction
-for the test and the application</li>
-<li>For more complex cases, or ones that cannot be tested this way,
-I use separate transactions.</li>
+<li>For most tests with simple or common logic, I use a shared transaction for the test and the application</li>
+<li>For more complex cases, or ones that cannot be tested with separate sessions, I use separate transactions.</li>
 </ul>
-<p>This combination allows for both good performance and convenient testing.</p>
-<p>The library provides several utilities that can be used in tests - for
-example, in fixtures.
-They help create tests that share a common transaction between the test
-and the application, so data isolation between tests is achieved through
-fast transaction rollback.</p>
+<p>The library provides several utilities that can be used in tests (e.g., fixtures). They create tests that share a common transaction between the test
+and the application. You achieve data isolation by rolling back transactions.
+
 <p>You can see these capabilities in the examples:</p>
 <p><a href="https://github.com/krylosov-aa/context-async-sqlalchemy/blob/main/examples/fastapi_example/tests/transactional">Here are tests with a common transaction between the
 application and the tests.</a></p>

docs/testing/index.html

@@ -88,8 +88,7 @@ from the target host.
 ```python
 async def create_session(self: DBConnect) -> AsyncSession:
 ```
-Creates a new session the library uses internally.
-You never need to call it directly. (Only maybe in some special cases.)
+Creates a new session. Used internally by the library. You may never need to call it directly.
 ---
 
 ### session_maker
@@ -196,7 +195,8 @@ async def atomic_db_session(
 A context manager you can use to wrap another function which
 uses a context session, making that call isolated within its own transaction.
 
-Several options define how a function handles an open transaction.
+There are several options that define how the function will handle
+an open transaction.
 
 current_transaction:
 
@@ -219,19 +219,18 @@ Commits the active session.
 ```python
 async def rollback_db_session(connect: DBConnect) -> None:
 ```
-Rolls back an active session.
+Rollbacks the active session.
 
 ---
 
 ### close_db_session
 ```python
 async def close_db_session(connect: DBConnect) -> None:
 ```
-Closes the current context session and returns the connection to the pool.
-If you close an uncommitted transaction, the connection rolls back
+Closes the current context session. The connection is returned to the pool.
+If you close an uncommitted transaction, the connection rolls back.
 
-This is useful when you need to run a database query at the start of the
-handler, then continue working over time without keeping the connection open.
+Use if you have more work you need to complete without keeping the connection open.
 
 ---