Skip to content

fix: MCP 域名管理工具参数约定不清晰,且缺乏文件写入类任务的处理指引#660

Merged
binggg merged 1 commit intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mo8xfv8b-20m1lv-mcp
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix: MCP 域名管理工具参数约定不清晰,且缺乏文件写入类任务的处理指引#660
binggg merged 1 commit intomainfrom
automation/attribution-issue-mo8xfv8b-20m1lv-mcp

Conversation

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@binggg binggg commented Apr 28, 2026

Attribution issue

  • issueId: issue_mo8xfv8b_20m1lv
  • category: tool
  • canonicalTitle: MCP 域名管理工具参数约定不清晰,且缺乏文件写入类任务的处理指引
  • representativeRun: atomic-js-cloudbase-cli-domains-lifecycle/2026-04-21T17-57-15-30bior

Automation summary

  • root_cause: Two distinct but related issues caused the agent to fail:
  1. Tool confusion: The agent confused envDomainManagement (for security domains/CORS whitelisting) with manageGateway(action="bindCustomDomain") (for custom domains with SSL certificates). The task asked to bind a domain with a certificate ID (WOjHRISM), which clearly requires manageGateway, but the agent likely attempted to use envDomainManagement which doesn't accept certificate parameters.
  2. Missing file-writing guidance: The task required recording operation results to internal evaluation artifact, but no skill/tool documentation provided guidance on how to handle such file-writing tasks.
  • changes:
  1. config/source/skills/cloudbase-platform/SKILL.md: Added clear distinction between domain management tools with a comparison table, key indicators for choosing the right tool, and a new section on "Recording Operation Results" with guidance for file-writing tasks.
  2. mcp/src/tools/env.ts: Updated envDomainManagement tool title to include "(安全域名 / CORS 白名单)" and enhanced description to explicitly state it does NOT involve SSL certificates and refers to manageGateway for custom domain

Changed files

  • config/source/skills/cloudbase-platform/SKILL.md
  • mcp/src/tools/env.ts
  • mcp/src/tools/gateway.ts

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@binggg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

binggg commented Apr 28, 2026

Attribution post-PR evaluation

  • visibility: internal identifiers, run ids, and private links are intentionally omitted
  • attempt: 1
  • eval_scope: primary_only
  • overall: PASSED
  • summary: all planned evaluation cases passed
  • updated_at: 2026-04-28T22:07:29.924Z

Cases

  • [PASSED] — primary — evaluation passed

@binggg binggg merged commit 99ee04f into main Apr 29, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant