Distinguish PureJuMP problems and ADNLPProblems ?

[BenjaminPINEAU]

Some problems are defined in PureJuMP but not in ADNLPProblems.
Then when you are doing

meta = OptimizationProblems.meta
my_problems = meta[(meta.has_equalities_only .== true), :name]

you can not iterate s.t

nlp_list = [OptimizationProblems.ADNLPProblems.eval(Meta.parse(problem))(), name = problem) for problem ∈ list_problems]

because some problems are not defined (rocket, to name just one).
Perhaps add an attribute that indicates whether a particular problem belongs to a specific problem format ?

[tmigot]

Oo, yes you are right. Allowing problems implemented in PureJuMP or in ADNLPProblems but not both was a recent decision to encourage more problems, but it poses this kind of problems.

A workaround is to also intersect with names(OptimizationProblems.ADNLPProblems).

It's a good idea to add a new field implementation that would take jump, adnlpmodels, both.